Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of different immunostaining techniques and monoclonal antibodies to the lower matrix phosphoprotein (pp65) for optimal quantitation of human cytomegalovirus antigenemia

Open access
Gerna, G, Revello, M G, Percivalle, E, Morini, F·1992·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

The main parameters of immunostaining techniques, i.e., the type of fixative, immunocytochemical reaction, and quality of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), for quantitation of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) antigenemia in peripheral blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes (currently performed by the indirect immunofluorescence or immunoperoxidase reaction by using MAbs to HCMV pp65) were investigated in order to optimize procedural steps and reagents. Significantly better results (in terms of the number of positive cells) were obtained on multiple cytospin preparations from heart transplant recipients with HCMV viremia when we used (i) formalin instead of methanol-acetone fixation and (ii) the indirect immunofluorescence reaction instead of the immunoperoxidase reaction, the avidin-biotin complex method, or the alkaline phosphatase antialkaline phosphatase procedure. In addition, comparison of the staining capabilities of three MAbs to pp65, which were developed in the laboratory and which were reactive to different epitopes of the protein, with a commercially available MAb (Clonab CMV) for determination of HCMV antigenemia showed that, while individual MAbs did not provide better results, the pool of MAbs detected a significantly higher number of positive peripheral blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes than Clonab CMV did. In addition, the sensitivity of the pool in detecting patients with low levels of viremia (less than 5/2 x 10(5) cells inoculated) as antigenemia positive was 100%, whereas the sensitivity of Clonab CMV was 47%. No differences in the specificities between the two MAb preparations were observed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.30.5.1232-1237.1992

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Gerna, G., Revello, M. G., Percivalle, E., & Morini, F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
1992-05
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
1232-1237
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W1948248797
Cited by
247
References
0
FWCI
13.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of different immunostaining techniques and monoclonal antibodies to the lower matrix phosphoprotein (pp65) for optimal quantitation of human cytomegalovirus antigenemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.30.5.1232-1237.1992
The paper
Gerna, G., Revello, M. G., Percivalle, E., & Morini, F. (1992). Comparison of different immunostaining techniques and monoclonal antibodies to the lower matrix phosphoprotein (pp65) for optimal quantitation of human cytomegalovirus antigenemia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.30.5.1232-1237.1992

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.