The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiplex PCR for identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in the clinical laboratory
Open accessAbstract
A multiplex PCR assay for detection of the staphylococcal mecA gene (the structural gene for penicillin-binding protein 2a) was compared with agar dilution and disk diffusion susceptibility test methods for identifying methicillin resistance. The multiplex PCR assay combined two primer sets (mecA and 16S rRNA) in a single reaction. A total of 500 staphylococcal isolates (228 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and 272 isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci) from clinical specimens were studied. For S. aureus, 40 of 40 mecA-positive isolates and 4 of 188 mecA-negative isolates were oxacillin resistant (positive and negative predictive values of 100 and 98%, respectively). In 3 of 4 discordant isolates, resistance was due to hyperproduction of beta-lactamase. For coagulase-negative staphylococci, 148 of 159 mecA-positive isolates and 0 of 113 mecA-negative isolates were oxacillin resistant (positive and negative predictive values of 93 and 100%, respectively). Twenty-six isolates were categorized as indeterminate because of the absence of a detectable 16S rRNA product. Four of these 26 isolates contained mecA when retested. The assay is designed to be incorporated into the work flow of the clinical microbiology laboratory and allows for the identification of intrinsic resistance in a timely and reliable manner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Agent of Bacillary Angiomatosis: An Approach to the Identification of Uncultured Pathogens
Relman, D. A., Loutit, J. S., Schmidt, T. M., Falkow, S., & Tompkins, L. S. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199012063232301 · Cited by 901
Cited by
Eleutherococcus senticosus (Rupr. & Maxim.) Maxim. (Araliaceae) as an adaptogen: a closer look
Davydov, M., & Krikorian, A. D. (2000) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0378-8741(00)00181-1 · Cited by 256
Role of Direct Bioautographic Method for Detection of Antistaphylococcal Activity of Essential Oils
Horváth, G., Jámbor, N., Kocsis, E., Böszörményi, A., Lemberkovics, Έ., Héthelyi, Έ., Kovács, K., & Kocsis, B. (2011) · Natural Product Communications · doi:10.1177/1934578x1100600939 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Geha, D. J., Uhl, J. R., Gustaferro, C. A., & Persing, D. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1768-1772
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1492012256
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiplex PCR for identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in the clinical laboratory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.32.7.1768-1772.1994
- The paper
- Geha, D. J., Uhl, J. R., Gustaferro, C. A., & Persing, D. H. (1994). Multiplex PCR for identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in the clinical laboratory. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.32.7.1768-1772.1994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.