Cited by 28Bacterial Infections and VaccinesBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingMicrobial infections and disease research

Confirmation of suspicious cases of meningococcal meningitis by PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Open access
Saunders, N B, Shoemaker, D R, Brandt, B L, Zollinger, W D·1997·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

A significant problem in efficacy trials of meningococcal vaccines has been accurate identification of all cases of meningococcal disease that occur in study populations. The accuracy of case determination would be improved by utilizing methods which confirm or disprove suspicious cases of meningococcal disease that are culture negative. A collection of serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from a meningococcal vaccine field trial performed in Iquique, Chile, were utilized to assess the status of patients for whom cultures, Gram stains, and clinical evaluations for meningococcal disease were available. Nested PCRs (nPCRs) for amplification of Neisseria meningitidis DNA in CSF samples and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for quantification of serum immunoglobulin G antibodies specific for N. meningitidis were used in combination to confirm or eliminate cases classified by physicians as suspicious for meningococcal disease. Samples from 12 of 79 patients suspected of having meningococcal meningitis tested positive by both methods; specimens from 61 of the 79 were negative by both methods; and samples from 6 patients yielded ambiguous results, and these cases remained unconfirmed. Direct sequence analysis of amplified DNA from patients suspected of having meningococcal disease confirmed that 2 of the 12 newly confirmed cases were not attributable to the typical epidemic strain (B:15:P1.[7],3) while the others were due to the epidemic strain. A combination of nPCR and ELISA reduced the number of suspicious cases in this study from 79 to 6, thereby improving the potential for assessment of vaccine efficacy. Molecular identification by nPCR in conjunction with immunological assessment of patient response could be considered diagnostic of disease in future testing of meningococcal vaccines to improve efficacy analyses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3215-3219.1997

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 28

Authors
Saunders, N. B., Shoemaker, D. R., Brandt, B. L., & Zollinger, W. D.
Affiliations
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
1997-12
Volume
35
Issue
12
Pages
3215-3219
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2157431476
Cited by
28
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
meningococcal meningitis, Neisseria meningitidis, vaccine efficacy trials, case confirmation, nested PCR, ELISA, serum IgG, cerebrospinal fluid, molecular diagnosis, epidemic strains
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Antibodies, Bacterial, Bacterial Vaccines, Bacteriological Techniques, Diagnostic Errors, DNA, Bacterial, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Meningitis, Meningococcal, Molecular Sequence Data, Neisseria meningitidis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Porins, Meningococcal Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review