Cited by 73Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFungal and yeast genetics research

Rapid flow cytometric susceptibility testing of Candida albicans

Open access
Ramani, R, Ramani, A, Wong, S J·1997·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

A rapid flow cytometric assay for in vitro antifungal drug susceptibility testing was developed by adapting the proposed reference method for broth macrodilution testing of yeasts. Membrane permeability changes caused by the antifungal agent were measured by flow cytometry using propidium iodide, a nucleic acid-binding fluorochrome largely excluded by the intact cell membrane. We determined the in vitro susceptibility of 31 Candida albicans isolates and two quality control strains (Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258) to amphotericin B and fluconazole. Amphotericin B MICs ranged from 0.03 to 2.0 microg/ml, while fluconazole MICs ranged from 0.125 to 128 microg/ml. This method results in clear-cut endpoints that were reproducible. Four-hour incubation was required for fluconazole, whereas a 2-h incubation was sufficient for amphotericin B to provide MICs comparable to the reference macrodilution method developed by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Tests. Results of these studies show that flow cytometry provides a rapid and sensitive in vitro method for antifungal susceptibility testing of C. albicans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.35.9.2320-2324.1997

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rapid detection of damaged cells by flow cytometry depends on the use of appropriate dyes staining.

    “The rapid detection of damaged cells by this approach depends on the use of appropriate dyes staining [96], [99].”
  • Sodium deoxycholate enhances diffusion of propidium iodide across the cell wall to pass through damaged yeast cell membranes.

    “Sodium deoxycholate was used in this study as it is reported to enhance the diffusion of propidium iodide across the cell wall to pass through the damaged yeast cell membranes [29,15].”
  • Deoxycholate is nontoxic to C. albicans.

    “Interestingly, the growth controls did not show dye uptake in the presence of deoxycholate as the deoxycholate is nontoxic to C. albicans [29].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 73

Authors
Ramani, R., Ramani, A., & Wong, S. J.
Affiliations
New York State Department of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ramani, R
  • Ramani, A
  • Wong, S J
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
1997-09
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
2320-2324
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2112141450
Cited by
73
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Candida albicans, antifungal susceptibility testing, flow cytometry, membrane permeability, propidium iodide, amphotericin B, fluconazole, minimum inhibitory concentration, Candida parapsilosis, Candida krusei
MeSH terms
Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Cell Membrane Permeability, Flow Cytometry, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Propidium, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Fluconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review