The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of Toxin A-Negative, Toxin B-Positive Clostridium difficile by PCR
Open accessAbstract
Toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile have been reported to produce both toxins A and B nearly always, and nontoxigenic strains have been reported to produce neither of these toxins. Recent studies indicate that it is not always true. We established a PCR assay to differentiate toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive (toxin A−, toxin B+) strains from both toxin-positive (toxin A+, toxin B+) strains and both toxin-negative (toxin A−, toxin B−) strains as an alternative to cell culture assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). By using the PCR primer set NK11 and NK9 derived from the repeating sequences of the toxin A gene, a shorter segment (ca. 700 bp) was amplified from toxin A−, toxin B+ strains compared to the size of the segment amplified from toxin A+, toxin B+ strains (ca. 1,200 bp), and no product was amplified from toxin A−, toxin B− strains. We examined a total of 421 C. difficile isolates by PCR. Of these, 48 strains showed a shorter segment by the PCR, were negative by ELISAs for the detection of toxin A, and were positive by cell culture assay. Although the cytotoxin produced by the toxin A−, toxin B+ strains was neutralized by anti-toxin B serum, the appearance of the cytotoxic effects on Vero cell monolayers was distinguishable from that of toxin A+, toxin B+ strains. By immunoblotting, the 44 toxin A−, toxin B+ strains were typed to serogroup F and the remaining four strains were serogroup X. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis separated the 48 strains into 19 types. The PCR assay for the detection of the repeating sequences combined with PCR amplification of the nonrepeating sequences of either the toxin A or the toxin B gene is indicated to be useful for differentiating toxin A−, toxin B+ strains from toxin A+, toxin B+ and toxin A−, toxin B− strains and will contribute to elucidation of the precise role of toxin A−, toxin B+ strains in intestinal diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Manual of Clinical Microbiology.
(1980) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-93-6-939_2 · Cited by 14,411
Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins
Lyerly, D. M., Krivan, H. C., & Wilkins, T. D. (1988) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.1.1.1 · Cited by 576
Effects of Clostridium difficile toxins given intragastrically to animals
Lyerly, D. M., Saum, K. E., MacDonald, D. K., & Wilkins, T. D. (1985) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.47.2.349-352.1985 · Cited by 400
Identification of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by the polymerase chain reaction
Kato, N., Ou, C. Y., Kato, H., Bartley, S. L., Brown, V. K., Dowell, V. R., & Ueno, K. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.29.1.33-37.1991 · Cited by 207
Self-citationNucleotide sequence of Clostridium difficile toxin B gene
Barroso, L., Wang, S.-Z., Phelps, C. J., Johnson, J. L., & Wilkins, T. D. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.13.4004 · Cited by 173
Borriello, S. P., Wren, B. W., Hyde, S., et al. (1992) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.60.10.4192-4199.1992 · Cited by 128
Multicenter Evaluation of the Clostridium difficile TOX A/B TEST
Lyerly, D. M., Neville, L. M., Evans, D. T., Fill, J. A., Allen, S. D., Greene, W. H., Sautter, R., Hnatuck, P., Torpey, D., & Schwalbe, R. A. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.36.1.184-190.1998 · Cited by 113
Gumerlock, P. H., Tang, Y., Meyers, F. J., & Silva, J. (1991) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/13.6.1053 · Cited by 101
Comparison of serogrouping and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for typing Clostridium difficile
Delmée, M., Laroche, Y., Avesani, V., & Cornelis, G. R. (1986) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.24.6.991-994.1986 · Cited by 77
Kato, H., Kato, N., Watanabe, K., Ueno, K., Ushijima, H., Hashira, S., & Abe, T. (1994) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.32.9.2067-2070.1994 · Cited by 77
Self-citation
Cited by
Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey
Bauer, M. P., Notermans, D. W., van Benthem, B. H., Brazier, J. S., Wilcox, M. H., Rupnik, M., Monnet, D. L., van Dissel, J. T., & Kuijper, E. J. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61266-4 · Cited by 1,020
A mouse model of clostridium difficile-associated disease
Chen, X., Katchar, K., Goldsmith, J. D., Nanthakumar, N., Cheknis, A., Gerding, D. N., & Kelly, C. P. (2008) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.002 · Cited by 510
Bacteriological evaluation of commercial canine and feline raw diets.
(2005) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Kato, H., Kato, N., Watanabe, K., Iwai, N., Nakamura, H., Yamamoto, T., Suzuki, K., Kim, S.-M., Chong, Y., & Wasito, E. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2178-2182
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2133711875
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of Toxin A-Negative, Toxin B-Positive Clostridium difficile by PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.36.8.2178-2182.1998
- The paper
- Kato, H., Kato, N., Watanabe, K., Iwai, N., Nakamura, H., Yamamoto, T., Suzuki, K., Kim, S.-M., Chong, Y., & Wasito, E. B. (1998). Identification of Toxin A-Negative, Toxin B-Positive Clostridium difficile by PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.36.8.2178-2182.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.