The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnosis of Herpes Simplex Virus Infections in the Clinical Laboratory by LightCycler PCR
Open accessAbstract
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) causes several clinical manifestations in both normal and immunocompromised hosts; this agent is the most frequently detected virus in diagnostic laboratories. Recovery of the virus in cell culture is considered the “gold standard” for detection of this virus from sources other than cerebrospinal fluid. LightCycler is a newly developed, commercially available system designed to rapidly perform PCR, with real-time detection of PCR products by a fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay. We compared the detection of HSV for 200 specimens (number of genital specimens, 160; number of dermal specimens, 38; number of ocular specimens, 2) by shell vial cell cultures (MRC-5) and by LightCycler PCR. Of a total of 88 (44%) HSV strains detected, 69 (78%) were detected by both shell vial cell cultures and LightCycler PCR (DNA polymerase target). A total of 19 (22%) specimens were detected exclusively by LightCycler PCR. No specimens were positive by the shell vial assay only. All 19 discrepant samples had HSV DNA detected by an independent PCR directed to the thymidine kinase gene of the virus. The melting curve analysis feature of the LightCycler instrument identified identical genotype results for HSV type 1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2 from 84 of 88 (96%) positive samples. Specimens can be extracted, target HSV DNA can be amplified, and HSV PCR products can be identified by genotype within 2 h after receipt of specimen into the laboratory. The increased level of accurate identification (all 88 positive samples) compared with that of shell vial cell culture (69 of 88 samples identified as positive) and the agreement of LightCycler PCR results with all shell vial positive results indicate the potential for routine implementation of this technology for laboratory diagnosis of HSV infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular Methods for Diagnosis of Viral Encephalitis
DeBiasi, R. L., & Tyler, K. L. (2004) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.17.4.903-925.2004 · Cited by 274
HSV-1 DNA in Tears and Saliva of Normal Adults
Kaufman, H. E., Azcuy, A. M., Varnell, E. D., Sloop, G. D., Thompson, H. W., & Hill, J. M. (2005) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0614 · Cited by 261
Liesman, R. M., Strasburg, A. P., Heitman, A. K., Theel, E. S., Patel, R., & Binnicker, M. J. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01927-17 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Espy, M. J., Uhl, J. R., Mitchell, P. S., Thorvilson, J. N., Svien, K. A., Wold, A. D., & Smith, T. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 795-799
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2107747866
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis of Herpes Simplex Virus Infections in the Clinical Laboratory by LightCycler PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.38.2.795-799.2000
- The paper
- Espy, M. J., Uhl, J. R., Mitchell, P. S., Thorvilson, J. N., Svien, K. A., Wold, A. D., & Smith, T. F. (2000). Diagnosis of Herpes Simplex Virus Infections in the Clinical Laboratory by LightCycler PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.38.2.795-799.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.