Cited by 119Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingMycobacterium research and diagnosis

Tetrazolium Microplate Assay as a Rapid and Inexpensive Colorimetric Method for Determination of Antibiotic Susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Open access
Caviedes, Luz, Delgado, Jose, Gilman, Robert H.·2002·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

The emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis underscores the need for low-cost, rapid methods to determine the susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to antibiotics. A new, rapid, easily read, and inexpensive colorimetric method with a tetrazolium indicator performs this determination as quickly and accurately as the more expensive Alamar Blue technique.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.40.5.1873-1874.2002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caviedes, L., Delgado, J., & Gilman, R. H.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE)
  • Asociación Benéfica PRISMA, Lima, Peru
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2002-05
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
1873-1874
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W1977824993
Cited by
119
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Fogarty International Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
Keywords
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, colorimetric assay, low-cost diagnostics
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Colorimetry, Costs and Cost Analysis, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Peru, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review