The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carried Meningococci in the Czech Republic: a Diverse Recombining Population
Open accessAbstract
Population and evolutionary analyses of pathogenic bacteria are frequently hindered by sampling strategies that concentrate on isolates from patients with invasive disease. This is especially so for the gram-negative diplococcus Neisseria meningitidis, a cause of septicemia and meningitis worldwide. Meningococcal isolate collections almost exclusively comprise organisms originating from patients with invasive meningococcal disease, although this bacterium is a commensal inhabitant of the human nasopharynx and very rarely causes pathological effects. In the present study, molecular biology-based techniques were used to establish the genetic relationships of 156 meningococci isolated from healthy young adults in the Czech Republic during 1993. None of the individuals sampled had known links to patients with invasive disease. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) showed that the bacterial population was highly diverse, comprising 71 different sequence types (STs) which were assigned to 34 distinct complexes or lineages. Three previously identified hyperinvasive lineages were present: 26 isolates (17%) belonged to the ST-41 complex (lineage 3); 4 (2.6%) belonged to the ST-11 (electrophoretic type [ET-37]) complex, and 1 (0.6%) belonged to the ST-32 (ET-5) complex. The data were consistent with the view that most nucleotide sequence diversity resulted from the reassortment of alleles by horizontal genetic exchange.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smith, J. M., Smith, N. H., O'Rourke, M., & Spratt, B. G. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.10.4384 · Cited by 1,802
Cited by
Re-evaluating prokaryotic species
Gevers, D., Cohan, F. M., Lawrence, J. G., Spratt, B. G., Coenye, T., Feil, E. J., Stackebrandt, E., de Peer, Y. V., Vandamme, P., Thompson, F. L., et al. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1236 · Cited by 1,122
Self-citationMultilocus Sequence Typing of Bacteria
Maiden, M. C. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121325 · Cited by 915
Self-citationMultilocus Sequence Typing System for Campylobacter jejuni
Dingle, K. E., Colles, F. M., Wareing, D. R. A., Ure, R., Fox, A. J., Bolton, F. E., Bootsma, H. J., Willems, R. J. L., Urwin, R., & Maiden, M. C. J. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.39.1.14-23.2001 · Cited by 852
Self-citationMulti-locus sequence typing: a tool for global epidemiology
Urwin, R., & Maiden, M. C. J. (2003) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2003.08.006 · Cited by 730
Self-citationMeningococcal carriage by age: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Christensen, H., May, M., Bowen, L., Hickman, M., & Trotter, C. L. (2010) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70251-6 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- Jolley, K. A., Kalmusova, J., Feil, E. J., Gupta, S., Musilek, M., Kriz, P., & Maiden, M. C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3549-3550
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2107970882
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carried Meningococci in the Czech Republic: a Diverse Recombining Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.40.9.3549-3550.2002
- The paper
- Jolley, K. A., Kalmusova, J., Feil, E. J., Gupta, S., Musilek, M., Kriz, P., & Maiden, M. C. J. (2002). Carried Meningococci in the Czech Republic: a Diverse Recombining Population. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.40.9.3549-3550.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.