The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of Encapsulated and Noncapsulated Haemophilus influenzae and Determination of Phylogenetic Relationships by Multilocus Sequence Typing
Open accessAbstract
A multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme has been developed for the unambiguous characterization of encapsulated and noncapsulated Haemophilus influenzae isolates. The sequences of internal fragments of seven housekeeping genes were determined for 131 isolates, comprising a diverse set of 104 serotype a, b, c, d, e, and f isolates and 27 noncapsulated isolates. Many of the encapsulated isolates had previously been characterized by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE), and the validity of the MLST scheme was established by the very similar clustering of isolates obtained by these methods. Isolates of serotypes c, d, e, and f formed monophyletic groups on a dendrogram constructed from the differences in the allelic profiles of the isolates, whereas there were highly divergent lineages of both serotype a and b isolates. Noncapsulated isolates were distinct from encapsulated isolates and, with one exception, were within two highly divergent clusters. The relationships between the major lineages of encapsulated H. influenzae inferred from MLEE data could not be discerned on a dendrogram constructed from differences in the allelic profiles, but were apparent on a tree reconstructed from the concatenated nucleotide sequences. Recombination has not therefore completely eliminated phylogenetic signal, and in support of this, for encapsulated isolates, there was significant congruence between many of the trees reconstructed from the sequences of the seven individual loci. Congruence was less apparent for noncapsulated isolates, suggesting that the impact of recombination is greater among noncapsulated than encapsulated isolates. The H. influenzae MLST scheme is available at www.mlst.net , it allows any isolate to be compared with those in the MLST database, and (for encapsulated isolates) it assigns isolates to their phylogenetic lineage, via the Internet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WENGER, J. D. (1998) · The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal · doi:10.1097/00006454-199809001-00008 · Cited by 153
Cited by
The Population Genetics of dN/dS
Kryazhimskiy, S., & Plotkin, J. B. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304 · Cited by 962
Multi-locus sequence typing: a tool for global epidemiology
Urwin, R., & Maiden, M. C. J. (2003) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2003.08.006 · Cited by 730
Comparisons of dN/dS are time dependent for closely related bacterial genomes
Rocha, E. P. C., Smith, J. M., Hurst, L. D., Holden, M. T. G., Cooper, J. E., Smith, N. H., & Feil, E. J. (2006) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.037 · Cited by 428
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Meats, E., Feil, E. J., Stringer, S., Cody, A. J., Goldstein, R., Kroll, J. S., Popovic, T., & Spratt, B. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1623-1636
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2136211808
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Encapsulated and Noncapsulated Haemophilus influenzae and Determination of Phylogenetic Relationships by Multilocus Sequence Typing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.41.4.1623-1636.2003
- The paper
- Meats, E., Feil, E. J., Stringer, S., Cody, A. J., Goldstein, R., Kroll, J. S., Popovic, T., & Spratt, B. G. (2003). Characterization of Encapsulated and Noncapsulated Haemophilus influenzae and Determination of Phylogenetic Relationships by Multilocus Sequence Typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.4.1623-1636.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.