Cited by 506HIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentHIV Research and TreatmentHepatitis C virus research

Multiple, Linked Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance Mutations in Treatment-Experienced Patients Are Missed by Standard Genotype Analysis

Open access
Palmer, Sarah, Kearney, Mary, Maldarelli, Frank, Halvas, Elias K., Bixby, Christian J., Bazmi, Holly, Rock, Diane, Falloon, Judith +6 more·2005·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

To investigate the extent to which drug resistance mutations are missed by standard genotyping methods, we analyzed the same plasma samples from 26 patients with suspected multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by using a newly developed single-genome sequencing technique and compared it to standard genotype analysis. Plasma samples were obtained from patients with prior exposure to at least two antiretroviral drug classes and who were on a failing antiretroviral regimen. Standard genotypes were obtained by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR and sequencing of the bulk PCR product. For single-genome sequencing, cDNA derived from plasma RNA was serially diluted to 1 copy per reaction, and a region encompassing p6, protease, and a portion of RT was amplified and sequenced. Sequences from 15 to 46 single viral genomes were obtained from each plasma sample. Drug resistance mutations identified by single-genome sequencing were not detected by standard genotype analysis in 24 of the 26 patients studied. Mutations present in less than 10% of single genomes were almost never detected in standard genotypes (1 of 86). Similarly, mutations present in 10 to 35% of single genomes were detected only 25% of the time in standard genotypes. For example, in one patient, 10 mutations identified by single-genome sequencing and conferring resistance to protease inhibitors (PIs), nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) were not detected by standard genotyping methods. Each of these mutations was present in 5 to 20% of the 20 genomes analyzed; 15% of the genomes in this sample contained linked PI mutations, none of which were present in the standard genotype. In another patient sample, 33% of genomes contained five linked NNRTI resistance mutations, none of which were detected by standard genotype analysis. These findings illustrate the inadequacy of the standard genotype for detecting low-frequency drug resistance mutations. In addition to having greater sensitivity, single-genome sequencing identifies linked mutations that confer high-level drug resistance. Such linkage cannot be detected by standard genotype analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.43.1.406-413.2005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proviruses encoding expressed viral genes can be identified by sequencing the expressed transcript, provided this is accomplished using single genome amplification to prevent in vitro recombination.

    “Proviruses encoding expressed viral genes can be identified by sequencing the expressed transcript, provided this is accomplished using a technique like single genome amplification 91 to prevent in vitro recombination.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palmer, S., Kearney, M., Maldarelli, F., Halvas, E. K., Bixby, C. J., Bazmi, H., Rock, D., Falloon, J., Davey, R. T., Dewar, R. L., Metcalf, J. A., Hammer, S., Mellors, J. W., & Coffin, J. M.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Critical Care Medicine Department Clinic
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Palmer, Sarah
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2005-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
406-413
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2152365654
Cited by
506
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 41
FWCI
16.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U01AI-38858, U01AI038858)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
Keywords
HIV-1 drug resistance, multidrug resistance, single-genome sequencing, low-frequency mutations, protease inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, treatment-experienced patients, viral quasispecies, plasma viral RNA
MeSH terms
Genotype, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mutation, RNA, Viral, Sensitivity and Specificity, HIV-1, HIV Infections, HIV Protease, Genome, Viral, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors, Anti-HIV Agents, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral, HIV Reverse Transcriptase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review