The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distribution of the Serine-Aspartate Repeat Protein-Encoding sdr Genes among Nasal-Carriage and Invasive Staphylococcus aureus Strains
Abstract
The sdr locus was found in all 497 investigated Staphylococcus aureus strains, although in 29 strains it contained only the sdrC gene ( sdrD negative, sdrE negative). The sdrC -positive, sdrD -negative, sdrE -negative gene profile was exclusive to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) strains (Fisher's exact test; P = 0.0005) and was not found in the strains collected from bone infections ( P = 0.0019). We also found a strong association between the presence of the sdrD gene and methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains ( P < 0.0001). Our findings suggest that MSSA strains with the newly uncovered sdrC -positive, sdrD -negative, sdrE -negative gene profile have a substantially decreased potential to establish bone infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The most characteristic of these regulations is the organization of microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) that mainly include fibronectin-binding proteins (FnBPs, including FnbA and FnbB) [21], fibrinogen-binding protein (Fib), clumping factors (ClfA, ClfB) [22], and serine-aspartate repeat family proteins (SdrC, SdrD, and SdrE) [23].”
From A Review of Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Regulation Mechanism (2022) · cites this paper as [23]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00632-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/JCM.40.12.4544-4546.2002 · DOI
- 10.1097/00003086-200101000-00032 · doi:10.1097/00003086-200101000-00032
- 10.1099/00221287-144-12-3387 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2380-2383.2005 · DOI
- 10.1089/mdr.2005.11.127 · DOI
- 10.1128/JCM.43.7.3095-3100.2005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/IAI.70.9.4987-4996.2002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1801-1804.2003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2054-2064.2004 · doi:10.1128/jcm.42.5.2054-2064.2004
- 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4465-4467.2003 · doi:10.1128/jcm.41.9.4465-4467.2003
- 10.1042/bj3450611 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.187.13.4584-4591.2005 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-140-6-200403160-00007 · DOI
Cited by
A Review of Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Regulation Mechanism
Peng, Q., Tang, X., Dong, W., Sun, N., & Yuan, W. (2022) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics12010012 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Sabat, A., Melles, D. C., Martirosian, G., Grundmann, H., van Belkum, A., & Hryniewicz, W.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Public Health, 00-725 Warsaw, Poland
- Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System, RijksInstituut voor Volksgezondheid and Milieu (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1135-1138
- ISSN
- 0095-1137
- 1098-660X
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of the Serine-Aspartate Repeat Protein-Encoding sdr Genes among Nasal-Carriage and Invasive Staphylococcus aureus Strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.44.3.1135-1138.2006
- The paper
- Sabat, A., Melles, D. C., Martirosian, G., Grundmann, H., van Belkum, A., & Hryniewicz, W. (2006). Distribution of the Serine-Aspartate Repeat Protein-Encoding sdr Genes among Nasal-Carriage and Invasive Staphylococcus aureus Strains. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.44.3.1135-1138.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
