Introductory Biology Textbooks Under-Represent Scientific Process
Open accessAbstract
Attrition of undergraduates from Biology majors is a long-standing problem. Introductory courses that fail to engage students or spark their curiosity by emphasizing the open-ended and creative nature of biological investigation and discovery could contribute to student detachment from the field. Our hypothesis was that introductory biology books devote relatively few figures to illustration of the design and interpretation of experiments or field studies, thereby de-emphasizing the scientific process. To investigate this possibility, we examined figures in six Introductory Biology textbooks published in 2008. On average, multistep scientific investigations were presented in fewer than 5% of the hundreds of figures in each book. Devoting such a small percentage of figures to the processes by which discoveries are made discourages an emphasis on scientific thinking. We suggest that by increasing significantly the illustration of scientific investigations, textbooks could support undergraduates’ early interest in biology, stimulate the development of design and analytical skills, and inspire some students to participate in investigations of their own.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students may be discouraged by textbooks' depiction of biology as a largely descriptive science.
“Students may be poorly prepared for college-level science, feel overwhelmed by the amount of new information covered in the introductory-level courses (Seymour and Hewitt, 1997), or be discouraged by textbooks’ depiction of biology as a largely descriptive science (Duncan et al., 2011).”
From CREATE Cornerstone: Introduction to Scientific Thinking, a New Course for STEM-Interested Freshmen, Demystifies Scientific Thinking through Analysis of Scientific Literature (2013) · cites this paper as Duncan et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Duncan, D. B., Lubman, A., & Hoskins, S. G.
- Affiliations
- City College of New York (US)
- Bard High School Early College Manhattan, 525 E Houston St., New York NY 10002
- Corresponding author
- Hoskins, Sally G.
- Venue
- Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-151
- ISSN
- 1935-7877 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-7885
- PMC
- PMC3577256
- OpenAlex
- W2041118358
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 21.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0942790)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
- Keywords
- scientific method, scientific inquiry, experimental design, fieldwork, student attrition, biology majors, scientific thinking, undergraduate biology education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review