Cited by 244Animal Virus Infections StudiesMicrobial infections and disease researchRespiratory viral infections research

A Metagenomics and Case-Control Study To Identify Viruses Associated with Bovine Respiratory Disease

Open access
Ng, Terry Fei Fan, Kondov, Nikola O., Deng, Xutao, Van Eenennaam, Alison, Neibergs, Holly L., Delwart, Eric·2015·Journal of Virology

Abstract

Unlabelled Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a common health problem for both dairy and beef cattle, resulting in significant economic loses. In order to identify viruses associated with BRD, we used a metagenomics approach to enrich and sequence viral nucleic acids in the nasal swabs of 50 young dairy cattle with symptoms of BRD. Following deep sequencing, de novo assembly, and translated protein sequence similarity searches, numerous known and previously uncharacterized viruses were identified. Bovine adenovirus 3, bovine adeno-associated virus, bovine influenza D virus, bovine parvovirus 2, bovine herpesvirus 6, bovine rhinitis A virus, and multiple genotypes of bovine rhinitis B virus were identified. The genomes of a previously uncharacterized astrovirus and picobirnaviruses were also partially or fully sequenced. Using real-time PCR, the rates of detection of the eight viruses that generated the most reads were compared for the nasal secretions of 50 animals with BRD versus 50 location-matched healthy control animals. Viruses were detected in 68% of BRD-affected animals versus 16% of healthy control animals. Thirty-eight percent of sick animals versus 8% of controls were infected with multiple respiratory viruses. Significantly associated with BRD were bovine adenovirus 3 (P Importance Bovine respiratory disease is the most economically important disease affecting the cattle industry, whose complex root causes include environmental, genetics, and infectious factors. U…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.00064-15

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, T. F. F., Kondov, N. O., Deng, X., Van Eenennaam, A., Neibergs, H. L., & Delwart, E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA
  • Washington State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
2015-05-15
Volume
89
Issue
10
Pages
5340-5349
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W2122410477
Cited by
244
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 4
FWCI
29.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL105770)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
Keywords
bovine respiratory disease, viral metagenomics, dairy cattle, astrovirus, picobirnavirus, viral coinfection, nasal swabs
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Female, Male, Phylogeny, Viruses, Case-Control Studies, Genome, Viral, Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex, Metagenomics, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review