Cited by 110HIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentHIV Research and TreatmentChemokine receptors and signaling

A maraviroc-resistant HIV-1 with narrow cross-resistance to other CCR5 antagonists depends on both N-terminal and extracellular loop domains of drug-bound CCR5

Open access
Tilton, John C., Wilen, Craig B., Didigu, Chukwuka A., Sinha, Rohini, Harrison, Jessamina E., Agrawal-Gamse, Caroline, Henning, Elizabeth A., Bushman, Frederick D. +3 more·2010·Journal of Virology

Abstract

CCR5 antagonists inhibit HIV entry by binding to a coreceptor and inducing changes in the extracellular loops (ECLs) of CCR5. In this study, we analyzed viruses from 11 treatment-experienced patients who experienced virologic failure on treatment regimens containing the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc (MVC). Viruses from one patient developed high-level resistance to MVC during the course of treatment. Although resistance to one CCR5 antagonist is often associated with broad cross-resistance to other agents, these viruses remained sensitive to most other CCR5 antagonists, including vicriviroc and aplaviroc. MVC resistance was dependent upon mutations within the V3 loop of the viral envelope (Env) protein and was modulated by additional mutations in the V4 loop. Deep sequencing of pretreatment plasma viral RNA indicated that resistance appears to have occurred by evolution of drug-bound CCR5 use, despite the presence of viral sequences predictive of CXCR4 use. Envs obtained from this patient before and during MVC treatment were able to infect cells expressing very low CCR5 levels, indicating highly efficient use of a coreceptor. In contrast to previous reports in which CCR5 antagonist-resistant viruses interact predominantly with the N terminus of CCR5, these MVC-resistant Envs were also dependent upon the drug-modified ECLs of CCR5 for entry. Our results suggest a model of CCR5 cross-resistance whereby viruses that predominantly utilize the N terminus are broadly cross-resistant to multiple CCR5 antagonists, whereas viruses that require both the N terminus and antagonist-specific ECL changes demonstrate a narrow cross-resistance profile.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.01109-10

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once HIV-1 infection is established, it is able to choose CXCR4 as an alternative co-receptor.

    “However, once HIV-1 infection is established, it is able to choose CXCR4 as an alternative co-receptor [47,48].”

    From Newer Gene Editing Technologies toward HIV Gene Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as [48]

  • CCR5 serves as the predominant co-receptor for HIV entry during initial transmission and through the early stages of infection.

    “Generally, CCR5 serves as the predominant co-receptor for HIV entry during initial transmission and through the early stages of infection.”

    From Newer Gene Editing Technologies toward HIV Gene Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 110

Authors
Tilton, J. C., Wilen, C. B., Didigu, C. A., Sinha, R., Harrison, J. E., Agrawal-Gamse, C., Henning, E. A., Bushman, F. D., Martin, J. N., Deeks, S. G., & Doms, R. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Doms, Robert W.
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
2010-10-15
Volume
84
Issue
20
Pages
10863-10876
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W2164681352
Cited by
110
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P01AI090935)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
Keywords
CCR5 antagonist, HIV-1, cross-resistance, vicriviroc, CCR5 coreceptor, viral entry, drug resistance evolution, treatment-experienced patients
MeSH terms
Maraviroc, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Cell Line, Cyclohexanes, Humans, Models, Biological, Mutation, Peptide Fragments, Triazoles, Cohort Studies, HIV-1, HIV Infections, HIV Envelope Protein gp120, Protein Structure, Tertiary, DNA Primers, Receptors, CCR5, HIV Fusion Inhibitors, Drug Resistance, Viral, Mutant Proteins, CCR5 Receptor Antagonists, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review