Merkel Cell Polyomavirus Large T Antigen Disrupts Host Genomic Integrity and Inhibits Cellular Proliferation
Open accessAbstract
Clonal integration of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV) DNA into the host genome has been observed in at least 80% of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). The integrated viral genome typically carries mutations that truncate the C-terminal DNA binding and helicase domains of the MCV large T antigen (LT), suggesting a selective pressure to remove this MCV LT region during tumor development. In this study, we show that MCV infection leads to the activation of host DNA damage responses (DDR). This activity was mapped to the C-terminal helicase-containing region of the MCV LT. The MCV LT-activated DNA damage kinases, in turn, led to enhanced p53 phosphorylation, upregulation of p53 downstream target genes, and cell cycle arrest. Compared to the N-terminal MCV LT fragment that is usually preserved in mutants isolated from MCC tumors, full-length MCV LT shows a decreased potential to support cellular proliferation, focus formation, and anchorage-independent cell growth. These apparently antitumorigenic effects can be reversed by a dominant-negative p53 inhibitor. Our results demonstrate that MCV LT-induced DDR activates p53 pathway, leading to the inhibition of cellular proliferation. This study reveals a key difference between MCV LT and simian vacuolating virus 40 LT, which activates a DDR but inhibits p53 function. This study also explains, in part, why truncation mutations that remove the MCV LT C-terminal region are necessary for the oncogenic progression of MCV-associated cancers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Virus-induced senescence appears to be a universal stress response in host cells and can be triggered by many virus species.
“VIS appears to be a universal stress response in host cells and can be induced by many different virus species.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [35]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 128
- Authors
- Li, J., Wang, X., Diaz, J., Tsang, S. H., Buck, C. B., & You, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Virology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2013-08-15
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 9173-9188
- ISSN
- 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5514
- PMC
- PMC3754048
- OpenAlex
- W2159249636
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA142723, R01CA148768, R01CA187718, P30CA016520)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Viral-associated cancers and disorders
- Keywords
- Merkel cell polyomavirus, large T antigen, Merkel cell carcinoma, DNA damage response, p53 phosphorylation, helicase domain, clonal integration, viral oncogenesis, cell cycle arrest, anchorage-independent growth, truncating mutations, host-virus interaction
- MeSH terms
- Antigens, Viral, Tumor, Cell Line, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Virus Integration, Virulence Factors, DNA Repair Enzymes, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Cell Cycle Checkpoints, Merkel cell polyomavirus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review