Cited by 70Influenza Virus Research StudiesImmune Response and Inflammationinterferon and immune responses

Genomic Profiling of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) Receptor and Interleukin-1 Receptor Knockout Mice Reveals a Link between TNF-α Signaling and Increased Severity of 1918 Pandemic Influenza Virus Infection

Open access
Belisle, Sarah E., Tisoncik, Jennifer R., Korth, Marcus J., Carter, Victoria S., Proll, Sean C., Swayne, David E., Pantin-Jackwood, Mary, Tumpey, Terrence M. +1 more·2010·Journal of Virology

Abstract

The influenza pandemic of 1918 to 1919 was one of the worst global pandemics in recent history. The highly pathogenic nature of the 1918 virus is thought to be mediated in part by a dysregulation of the host response, including an exacerbated proinflammatory cytokine response. In the present study, we compared the host transcriptional response to infection with the reconstructed 1918 virus in wild-type, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-1 knockout (TNFRKO), and interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor-1 knockout (IL1RKO) mice as a means of further understanding the role of proinflammatory cytokine signaling during the acute response to infection. Despite reported redundancy in the functions of IL-1β and TNF-α, we observed that reducing the signaling capacity of each of these molecules by genetic disruption of their key receptor genes had very different effects on the host response to infection. In TNFRKO mice, we found delayed or decreased expression of genes associated with antiviral and innate immune signaling, complement, coagulation, and negative acute-phase response. In contrast, in IL1RKO mice numerous genes were differentially expressed at 1 day postinoculation, including an increase in the expression of genes that contribute to dendritic and natural killer cell processes and cellular movement, and gene expression profiles remained relatively constant at later time points. We also observed a compensatory increase in TNF-α expression in virus-infected IL1RKO mice. Our data suggest that signaling through the IL-1 receptor is protective, whereas signaling through the TNF-α receptor increases the severity of 1918 virus infection. These findings suggest that manipulation of these pathways may have therapeutic benefit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.01310-10

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The transcriptional response in IL1R KO mice during acute infection is strongly associated with an increase in TNF gene expression, revealing the interplay between IL-1 and TNF proinflammatory mediators.

    “The transcriptional response in IL1R KO mice during acute infection is strongly associated with an increase in TNF gene expression, revealing the interplay between IL-1 and TNF proinflammatory mediators (11).”

    From Into the Eye of the Cytokine Storm (2012) · cites this paper as [11]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 70

Authors
Belisle, S. E., Tisoncik, J. R., Korth, M. J., Carter, V. S., Proll, S. C., Swayne, D. E., Pantin-Jackwood, M., Tumpey, T. M., & Katze, M. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Department of Microbiology
  • United States Department of Agriculture (US)
  • Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Athens, Georgia 30606
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
2010-12-15
Volume
84
Issue
24
Pages
12576-12588
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W2172025483
Cited by
70
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P01AI058113)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
Keywords
TNF-alpha receptor, interleukin-1 receptor, host transcriptional response, IL-1β, innate immune response, antiviral gene expression, complement and coagulation, acute phase response, dendritic cells, natural killer cells, influenza pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Communication, Cell Movement, Dendritic Cells, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Orthomyxoviridae Infections, Influenza A virus, RNA, Messenger, Triazoles, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, Biomarkers, Mice, Knockout, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I, Mice, Receptors, Interleukin-1 Type I, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review