Cited by 59HIV Research and TreatmentAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsT-cell and Retrovirus Studies

Conserved and Variable Features of Gag Structure and Arrangement in Immature Retrovirus Particles

Open access
de Marco, Alex, Davey, Norman E., Ulbrich, Pavel, Phillips, Judith M., Lux, Vanda, Riches, James D., Fuzik, Tibor, Ruml, Tomas +3 more·2010·Journal of Virology

Abstract

The assembly of retroviruses is driven by oligomerization of the Gag polyprotein. We have used cryo-electron tomography together with subtomogram averaging to describe the three-dimensional structure of in vitro-assembled Gag particles from human immunodeficiency virus, Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, and Rous sarcoma virus. These represent three different retroviral genera: the lentiviruses, betaretroviruses and alpharetroviruses. Comparison of the three structures reveals the features of the supramolecular organization of Gag that are conserved between genera and therefore reflect general principles of Gag-Gag interactions and the features that are specific to certain genera. All three Gag proteins assemble to form approximately spherical hexameric lattices with irregular defects. In all three genera, the N-terminal domain of CA is arranged in hexameric rings around large holes. Where the rings meet, 2-fold densities, assigned to the C-terminal domain of CA, extend between adjacent rings, and link together at the 6-fold symmetry axis with a density, which extends toward the center of the particle into the nucleic acid layer. Although this general arrangement is conserved, differences can be seen throughout the CA and spacer peptide regions. These differences can be related to sequence differences among the genera. We conclude that the arrangement of the structural domains of CA is well conserved across genera, whereas the relationship between CA, the spacer peptide region, and the nucleic acid is more specific to each genus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.01423-10

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although previous low-resolution structures showed a similar immature lattice spacing of 80 A and suggested a conserved CA-NTD arrangement, the arrangement of the CA-NTD domains was different in all three viruses when observed at higher resolution.

    “Unexpectedly, although previous low-resolution structures had showed a similar immature lattice spacing of 80 A ˚ and suggested a conserved CA-NTD arrangement [33,34], the arrangement of the CA-NTD domains was in fact different in all three viruses when observed at higher-resolution.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Marco, A., Davey, N. E., Ulbrich, P., Phillips, J. M., Lux, V., Riches, J. D., Fuzik, T., Ruml, T., Kräusslich, H.-G., Vogt, V. M., & Briggs, J. A. G.
Affiliations
  • Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague (CZ)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology and Center of Applied Genomics, Institute of Chemical Technology, Prague, Technicka 3, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Department of Infectious Diseases, Virology, University Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Corresponding author
Briggs, John A. G.
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
2010-11-15
Volume
84
Issue
22
Pages
11729-11736
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W2072980373
Cited by
59
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (6046137305)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Cancer Institute (CA20081, R01CA020081)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
Keywords
Gag protein, immature virus particles, HIV-1, Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, Rous sarcoma virus, lentivirus, structural conservation
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Cell Line, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Virion, HIV-1, Gene Products, gag, Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, Sequence Alignment, Conserved Sequence, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Virus Assembly, Rous sarcoma virus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review