Cited by 162Influenza Virus Research Studiesinterferon and immune responsesImmune Response and Inflammation

Pandemic H1N1 2009 Influenza A Virus Induces Weak Cytokine Responses in Human Macrophages and Dendritic Cells and Is Highly Sensitive to the Antiviral Actions of Interferons

Open access
Österlund, Pamela, Pirhonen, Jaana, Ikonen, Niina, Rönkkö, Esa, Strengell, Mari, Mäkelä, Sanna M., Broman, Mia, Hamming, Ole J. +3 more·2010·Journal of Virology

Abstract

In less than 3 months after the first cases of swine origin 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infections were reported from Mexico, WHO declared a pandemic. The pandemic virus is antigenically distinct from seasonal influenza viruses, and the majority of human population lacks immunity against this virus. We have studied the activation of innate immune responses in pandemic virus-infected human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages. Pandemic A/Finland/553/2009 virus, representing a typical North American/European lineage virus, replicated very well in these cells. The pandemic virus, as well as the seasonal A/Brisbane/59/07 (H1N1) and A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) viruses, induced type I (alpha/beta interferon [IFN-α/β]) and type III (IFN-λ1 to -λ3) IFN, CXCL10, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) gene expression weakly in DCs. Mouse-adapted A/WSN/33 (H1N1) and human A/Udorn/72 (H3N2) viruses, instead, induced efficiently the expression of antiviral and proinflammatory genes. Both IFN-α and IFN-β inhibited the replication of the pandemic (H1N1) virus. The potential of IFN-λ3 to inhibit viral replication was lower than that of type I IFNs. However, the pandemic virus was more sensitive to the antiviral IFN-λ3 than the seasonal A/Brisbane/59/07 (H1N1) virus. The present study demonstrates that the novel pandemic (H1N1) influenza A virus can readily replicate in human primary DCs and macrophages and efficiently avoid the activation of innate antiviral responses. It is, however, highly sensitive to the antiviral actions of IFNs, which may provide us an additional means to treat severe cases of infection especially if significant drug resistance emerges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.01619-09

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TNF is highly expressed across infection models, including primary human respiratory epithelial cells and human monocyte-derived macrophages, compared with seasonal H1N1 and swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus infection.

    “It is highly expressed across infection models, including primary human respiratory epithelial cells (24, 125) and human monocyte-derived macrophages (26, 59, 62), compared with during seasonal H1N1 influenza virus and swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus (SOIV) infection (111).”

    From Into the Eye of the Cytokine Storm (2012) · cites this paper as [111]

  • Secondary effects of cytokine cascades, as opposed to the direct effect of the virus, in amplifying and broadening the proinflammatory response may be important in the escalation of cytokine storm.

    “The concept of secondary effects of cytokine cascades, as opposed to the direct effect of the virus, in amplifying and broadening the proinflammatory response may be important in the escalation of cytokine storm (24,111,125).”

    From Into the Eye of the Cytokine Storm (2012) · cites this paper as [111]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 162

Authors
Österlund, P., Pirhonen, J., Ikonen, N., Rönkkö, E., Strengell, M., Mäkelä, S. M., Broman, M., Hamming, O. J., Hartmann, R., Ziegler, T., & Julkunen, I.
Affiliations
  • Viral Infections Unit, Department of Vaccination and Immune Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
2010-02
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
1414-1422
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W2126623340
Cited by
162
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
15.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland
  • Socialdepartementet
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
2009 H1N1 influenza A virus, pandemic influenza, innate immune response, macrophages, dendritic cells, type I interferon, interferon lambda, antiviral activity, cytokine gene expression, CXCL10, TNF-α, viral replication, seasonal H1N1 influenza, H3N2, interferon resistance
MeSH terms
Antiviral Agents, Cells, Cultured, Dendritic Cells, Enzyme Inhibitors, Humans, Influenza, Human, Macrophages, Neuraminidase, Virus Replication, Cytokines, Interferon-alpha, Interferon-beta, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review