Cited by 50HIV Research and TreatmentHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentT-cell and Retrovirus Studies

Roles of Pr55 gag and NCp7 in tRNA 3 Lys Genomic Placement and the Initiation Step of Reverse Transcription in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

Open access
Cen, Shan, Khorchid, Ahmad, Gabor, Juliana, Rong, Liwei, Wainberg, Mark A., Kleiman, Lawrence·2000·Journal of Virology

Abstract

To study in vivo tRNA 3 Lys genomic placement and the initiation step of reverse transcription in human immunodeficiency virus type 1, total viral RNA isolated from either wild-type or protease-negative (PR − ) virus was used as the source of primer tRNA 3 Lys /genomic RNA templates in an in vitro reverse transcription assay. At low dCTP concentrations, both the rate and extent of the first nucleotide incorporated into tRNA 3 Lys , dCTP, were lower with PR − than with wild-type total viral RNA. Transient in vitro exposure of either type of primer/template RNA to NCp7 increased PR − dCTP incorporation to wild-type levels but did not change the level of wild-type dCTP incorporation. Exposure of either primer/template to Pr55 gag had no effect on initiation. These results indicate that while Pr55 gag is sufficient for tRNA 3 Lys placement onto the genome, exposure of this complex to mature NCp7 is required for optimum tRNA 3 Lys placement and initiation of reverse transcription.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.74.22.10796-10800.2000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A multistaged tRNA primer annealing process has been proposed wherein initial annealing by Gag is followed by more optimized annealing by NC in mature virions.

    “A multistaged tRNA primer annealing process has been proposed, wherein initial annealing by Gag is followed by more optimized annealing by NC in mature virions (45,46), a model further supported by in virio RNA structure-probing analysis (47).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cen, S., Khorchid, A., Gabor, J., Rong, L., Wainberg, M. A., & Kleiman, L.
Affiliations
Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
2000-11-15
Volume
74
Issue
22
Pages
10796-10800
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W2133308157
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
Keywords
HIV-1, reverse transcription initiation, NCp7, reverse transcriptase
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Capsid, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Precursors, RNA, Transfer, Lys, Transcription, Genetic, Viral Proteins, HIV-1, Gene Products, gag, Genome, Viral, Virus Assembly, Capsid Proteins, gag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review