The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complete Bypass of Restriction Systems for Major Staphylococcus aureus Lineages
Open accessAbstract
Staphylococcus aureus is a prominent global nosocomial and community-acquired bacterial pathogen. A strong restriction barrier presents a major hurdle for the introduction of recombinant DNA into clinical isolates of S. aureus . Here, we describe the construction and characterization of the IMXXB series of Escherichia coli strains that mimic the type I adenine methylation profiles of S. aureus clonal complexes 1, 8, 30, and ST93. The IMXXB strains enable direct, high-efficiency transformation and streamlined genetic manipulation of major S. aureus lineages. IMPORTANCE The genetic manipulation of clinical S. aureus isolates has been hampered due to the presence of restriction modification barriers that detect and subsequently degrade inappropriately methylated DNA. Current methods allow the introduction of plasmid DNA into a limited subset of S. aureus strains at high efficiency after passage of plasmid DNA through the restriction-negative, modification-proficient strain RN4220. Here, we have constructed and validated a suite of E. coli strains that mimic the adenine methylation profiles of different clonal complexes and show high-efficiency plasmid DNA transfer. The ability to bypass RN4220 will reduce the cost and time involved for plasmid transfer into S. aureus . The IMXXB series of E. coli strains should expedite the process of mutant construction in diverse genetic backgrounds and allow the application of new techniques to the genetic manipulation of S. aureus .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fang, G., Munera, D., Friedman, D. I., Mandlik, A., Chao, M. C., Banerjee, O., Feng, Z., Losic, B., Mahajan, M. C., Jabado, O. J., et al. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2432 · Cited by 360
Cited by
Engineered skin bacteria induce antitumor T cell responses against melanoma
Chen, Y. E., Bousbaine, D., Veinbachs, A., Atabakhsh, K., Dimas, A., Yu, V. K., Zhao, A., Enright, N. J., Nagashima, K., Belkaid, Y., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abp9563 · Cited by 191
The second messenger c-di-AMP inhibits the osmolyte uptake system OpuC in Staphylococcus aureus
Schuster, C. F., Bellows, L. E., Tosi, T., Campeotto, I., Corrigan, R. M., Freemont, P., & Gründling, A. (2016) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aaf7279 · Cited by 109
Gene silencing with CRISPRi in bacteria and optimization of dCas9 expression levels
Depardieu, F., & Bikard, D. (2020) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.07.024 · Cited by 86
sRNA-controlled iron sparing response in Staphylococci
Coronel-Tellez, R. H., Pospiech, M., Barrault, M., Liu, W., Bordeau, V., Vasnier, C., Felden, B., Sargueil, B., & Bouloc, P. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac648 · Cited by 43
Silva, K. P. T., Sundar, G., & Khare, A. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38507-4 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Monk, I. R., Tree, J. J., Howden, B. P., Stinear, T. P., & Foster, T. J.
- Venue
- mBio
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e00308-15
- ISSN
- 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-2129
- OpenAlex
- W2169614539
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complete Bypass of Restriction Systems for Major Staphylococcus aureus Lineages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mbio.00308-15
- The paper
- Monk, I. R., Tree, J. J., Howden, B. P., Stinear, T. P., & Foster, T. J. (2015). Complete Bypass of Restriction Systems for Major Staphylococcus aureus Lineages. mBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00308-15
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.