The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Genomics of Enterococci: Variation in Enterococcus faecalis, Clade Structure in E. faecium, and Defining Characteristics of E . gallinarum and E . casseliflavus
Open accessAbstract
The enterococci are Gram-positive lactic acid bacteria that inhabit the gastrointestinal tracts of diverse hosts. However, Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis have emerged as leading causes of multidrug-resistant hospital-acquired infections. The mechanism by which a well-adapted commensal evolved into a hospital pathogen is poorly understood. In this study, we examined high-quality draft genome data for evidence of key events in the evolution of the leading causes of enterococcal infections, including E. faecalis , E. faecium , E . casseliflavus , and E . gallinarum . We characterized two clades within what is currently classified as E. faecium and identified traits characteristic of each, including variation in operons for cell wall carbohydrate and putative capsule biosynthesis. We examined the extent of recombination between the two E. faecium clades and identified two strains with mosaic genomes. We determined the underlying genetics for the defining characteristics of the motile enterococci E . casseliflavus and E . gallinarum . Further, we identified species-specific traits that could be used to advance the detection of medically relevant enterococci and their identification to the species level. IMPORTANCE The enterococci, in particular, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, have emerged as leading causes of multidrug-resistant hospital-acquired infections. In this study, we examined genome sequence data to define traits with the potential to influence host-microbe interactions and to identify sequences and biochemical functions that could form the basis for the rapid identification of enterococcal species or lineages of importance in clinical and environmental samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput
Edgar, R. C. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340 · Cited by 44,662
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · Cited by 14,894
The Pfam Protein Families Database
Bateman, A. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.276 · Cited by 14,000
trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M., & Gabaldón, T. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 · Cited by 12,751
Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G., & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 · Cited by 12,654
Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics
Krzywinski, M., Schein, J., Birol, İ., Connors, J., Gascoyne, R., Horsman, D., Jones, S. J., & Marra, M. A. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.092759.109 · Cited by 10,964
Accelerated Profile HMM Searches
Eddy, S. R. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · Cited by 6,975
KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment
Kanehisa, M., Araki, M., Goto, S., Hattori, M., Hirakawa, M., Itoh, M., Katayama, T., Kawashima, S., Okuda, S., Tokimatsu, T., et al. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm882 · Cited by 6,782
OrthoMCL: Identification of Ortholog Groups for Eukaryotic Genomes
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J., & Roos, D. S. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1224503 · Cited by 5,707
Cited by
Bacterial Communities: Interactions to Scale
Stubbendieck, R. M., Vargas-Bautista, C., & Straight, P. D. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01234 · Cited by 572
Fiore, E., Van Tyne, D., & Gilmore, M. S. (2019) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0053-2018 · Cited by 503
Self-citationAhmed, M. O., & Baptiste, K. E. (2018) · Microbial Drug Resistance · doi:10.1089/mdr.2017.0147 · Cited by 438
van Schaik, W. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0087 · Cited by 364
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H. (2013) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3449 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Palmer, K. L., Godfrey, P., Griggs, A., Kos, V. N., Zucker, J., Desjardins, C., Cerqueira, G., Gevers, D., Walker, S., Wortman, J., Feldgarden, M., Haas, B., Birren, B., & Gilmore, M. S.
- Venue
- mBio
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e00318-11
- ISSN
- 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-2129
- OpenAlex
- W2104371716
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 10.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Genomics of Enterococci: Variation in Enterococcus faecalis, Clade Structure in E. faecium, and Defining Characteristics of E . gallinarum and E . casseliflavus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mbio.00318-11
- The paper
- Palmer, K. L., Godfrey, P., Griggs, A., Kos, V. N., Zucker, J., Desjardins, C., Cerqueira, G., Gevers, D., Walker, S., Wortman, J., Feldgarden, M., Haas, B., Birren, B., & Gilmore, M. S. (2012). Comparative Genomics of Enterococci: Variation in Enterococcus faecalis, Clade Structure in E. faecium, and Defining Characteristics of E . gallinarum and E . casseliflavus. mBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00318-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.