The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arm and head domain in highly conserved lipoprotein modification enzyme Lgt determine functional diversity among bacterial pathogens
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The post-translational lipoprotein modification pathway is conserved in bacteria, in which prolipoprotein phosphatidylglycerol diacylglyceryl transferase (Lgt) catalyzes the first and committed step. Due to its essentiality for cell viability in Proteobacteria, its membrane localization, and relative accessibility, Lgt is proposed as a promising target for the development of novel antibiotics. To answer the question of the degree of conservation between Lgt homologs of WHO-listed pathogenic species, we performed evolutionary, structural, and functional analyses. Our data show that Lgt is present in all bacteria and absent from archaea. AlphaFold structural models are similar to the X-ray structure of Lgt from E. coli with most variability and less conserved residues in the arm and head domains between Lgt homologs. Lgt of diderm bacteria, but not of monoderm bacteria, restores growth and viability of an Lgt depletion strain in E. coli . Sequence alignments and site-directed mutagenesis demonstrate that unique conserved residues on arm-2 together with histidine 103 and the periplasmic head domain, determine protein substrate specificity. This large-scale analysis led to the definition of an Lgt motif and an alternative catalytic mechanism. Our results highlight similarities in catalytic mechanism and differences in substrate specificity between Lgt homologs from pathogenic species, with an impact on strategies to develop narrow-spectrum antibiotics targeting Lgt. IMPORTANCE: Antimicrobial resistance is a major threat to public health, for which the identification of novel targets and the development of new therapies are urgently needed. The bacterial lipoprotein modification pathway is promising for the exploration of new antibiotics since it is unique to bacteria, essential for bacterial viability and virulence, and accessible to drugs due to the exposed domains of the modification enzymes. In this study, we explored large-scale sequence analysis, structural modeling, and functional assays of the first enzyme in the pathway. Our findings show that the enzyme is highly conserved across distant phyla, that homologous enzymes have similar structures and contain a signature motif composed of invariant essential residues, but that functional conservation divides monoderm and diderm pathogenic bacteria. This correlates with structural variation and differences in substrate specificity, illustrating the potential for the development of narrow-spectrum antibiotics targeting the lipoprotein modification pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a000414 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-micro-041522-094053 · DOI
- 10.1093/femsre/fuu006 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)32077-X · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)89066-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-1097(91)90251-5 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2410909121 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi9020346 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07990.x · DOI
- 10.1128/mBio.01619-20 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.00099-17 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M111.292235 · DOI
- 10.1128/MMBR.00028-16 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0803873105 · DOI
- 10.1080/14760584.2022.2102484 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2021.788445 · DOI
- 10.1111/mmi.14610 · DOI
- 10.7164/antibiotics.31.1203 · DOI
- 10.1128/AAC.06148-11 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-13724-y · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.00149-21 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110894 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms10198 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.179.9.2944-2948.1997 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b04227 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02185-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/533452 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-14-4 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.177.23.6820-6824.1995 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.06641-11 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.00164-22 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41564-022-01066-3 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.179.9.2857-2862.1997 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abe0511 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41559-020-01299-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01197 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2024.102819 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06034.x · DOI
- 10.1155/2010/410975 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-025-63625-6 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07261.x · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.00127-12 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz745 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.72.7.3987-4003.2004 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41589-021-00845-z · DOI
- 10.1128/spectrum.00470-24 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)40001-X · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbalip.2016.10.007 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrmicro1839 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0175886 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04044.x · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2148-10-210 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.4285 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Legood, S., Oliveira Paiva, A., Taib, N., Ruffiot, T., Gribaldo, S., Gomperts Boneca, I., & Buddelmeijer, N.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Unité Biologie et Génétique de la Paroi Bactérienne, UMR6047 CNRS, INSERM U1306
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Unité Biologie Évolutive de la Cellule Microbienne
- Corresponding author
- Buddelmeijer, Nienke
- Venue
- mBio
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2026-06-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e0060026-e0060026
- ISSN
- 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4408919778
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Programmes Transversaux de Recherche Institut Pasteur (PTR626-23)
- Programme Bacteries et champignons face aux antibiotiques et antifongiques (DBF20160635726)
- Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (EQU202403018034)
- Pasteur Paris University Oxford PhD programme
- Fondation Bettencourt Schueller (Impulscience (ENVOL))
- Investissement d'Avenir program LabEx IBEID (ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Keywords
- Lgt, lipoprotein modification, substrate specificity, catalytic mechanism, pathogenic bacteria, antibiotic targets, antimicrobial resistance, protein structure conservation, Escherichia coli
- MeSH terms
- Protein Domains, Amino Acid Sequence, Bacteria, Escherichia coli, Lipoproteins, Models, Molecular, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Transferases, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Sequence Alignment, Conserved Sequence, Transferases (Other Substituted Phosphate Groups)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review