The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AcrIF11 is a potent CRISPR-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase encoded by phage and plasmid
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Phage-encoded anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins inhibit CRISPR-Cas systems, allowing phage replication and lysogeny maintenance. Most of the Acrs characterized to date are stable stoichiometric inhibitors. While enzymatic Acrs have been characterized biochemically, little is known about their potency, specificity, and reversibility. Here, we examine AcrIF11, a widespread phage and plasmid-encoded ADP-ribosyltransferase (ART) that inhibits the Type I-F CRISPR-Cas system. We present a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure of an AcrIF11 homolog that reveals chemical shift perturbations consistent with NAD (cofactor) binding. In experiments that model both lytic phage replication and MGE/lysogen stability under high targeting pressure, AcrIF11 is a highly potent CRISPR-Cas inhibitor and more robust to Cas protein-level fluctuations than stoichiometric inhibitors. Furthermore, we demonstrate that AcrIF11 is remarkably specific, predominantly ADP-ribosylating Csy1 when expressed in P. aeruginosa . Given the reversible nature of ADP-ribosylation, we hypothesized that ADPr eraser enzymes (macrodomains) could remove ADPr from Csy1, a potential limitation of PTM-based CRISPR inhibition. We demonstrate that a human macrodomain can indeed remove the modification from Csy1 in P. aeruginosa lysate. Together, these experiments connect the in vitro observations of AcrIF11’s enzymatic activity to its potent and specific effects in vivo , clarifying the advantages and drawbacks of enzymatic Acrs in the evolutionary arms race between phages and bacteria. IMPORTANCE: Bacteria have evolved diverse immune systems to prevent phage infection, and, consequently, phages have evolved diverse methods of evading bacterial immune systems. To evade the bacterial CRISPR-Cas immune system, phages encode anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs). Acrs disable CRISPR-Cas by either stably binding to the CRISPR-Cas complex or by enzymatic modification. However, Acr enzymes have not been characterized in vivo during lytic infection or lysogenic maintenance. Here, we report the benefits and drawbacks of enzymatic inhibition with AcrIF11, an ADP-ribosyltransferase. Under “high pressure” scenarios such as high CRISPR targeting or CRISPR-Cas overexpression, AcrIF11 outperforms a strong, stable binding Acr by very specifically modifying the Cas8 protein, but nothing else in the cell. AcrIF11 additionally stabilizes lysogeny effectively, but the ADP-ribose modification can potentially be removed by macrodomains, which are ADP-ribose eraser enzymes. AcrIF11 is therefore a potent and widespread plasmid/phage-encoded inhibitor of Type I-F CRISPR-Cas systems with catalytic activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation
Lovell, S. C., Davis, I. W., Arendall, W. B., de Bakker, P. I. W., Word, J. M., Prisant, M. G., Richardson, J. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10286 · Cited by 4,595
How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?
Xu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066 · Cited by 1,142
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-120107 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-10577-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-024-07642-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chom.2019.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41564-020-0692-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1197 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1909-5 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41594-019-0206-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41421-022-00396-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.09.015 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aau5174 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-1936-2 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi035907z · DOI
- 10.1038/embor.2008.90 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M201844200 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-023-01953-y · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.00105-22 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.013 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature11723 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.058 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113849 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41564-020-0691-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.014 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41564-022-01153-5 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-16703-w · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
- Pinto AF, Schüler H. 2015. Edited by Endogenous ADP-Ribosylation. Comparative structural analysis of the putative mono-ADP-ribosyltransferases of the ARTD/PARP family. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
- 10.1038/nchembio.2568 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-45068-7 · DOI
- 10.3390/toxins16050208 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.012 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.186.21.7262-7272.2004 · DOI
- Cavanagh J, Skelton NJ, Fairbrother WJ, Rance M, Palmer III AG. 2006. Protein NMR spectroscopy principles and practice. 2nd ed. Elsevier Academic Press.
- 10.1002/mrc.1941 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00211777 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20449 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.11.008 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl589 · DOI
- 10.1107/s0907444998003254 · DOI
- 10.1023/a:1008276004875 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkf436 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/msp077 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl529 · DOI
- 10.1089/crispr.2018.0043 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.4792 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.006 · DOI
- 10.26508/lsa.202201455 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.abf8711 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, D. F., Roe, L. T., Yuping, L., Borges, A. L., Zhang, J. Y., Babbar, P., Maji, S., Stevens, M. G. V., Correy, G. J., Diolaiti, M. E., Smith, D. H., Ashworth, A., Stroud, R. M., Kelly, M. J. S., Bondy-Denomy, J., & Fraser, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California San Francisco
- Corresponding author
- Fraser, James S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- mBio
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2025-09-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e0169825-e0169825
- ISSN
- 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12421852
- OpenAlex
- W4413139008
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (GM145238, U19AI171110)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- anti-CRISPR proteins, ADP-ribosyltransferase, type I-F CRISPR-Cas, ADP-ribosylation, macrodomain, phage-bacteria arms race, lysogeny, phage replication, NAD+ binding, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review