Cited by 173Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Differential roles of Sall4 isoforms in embryonic stem cell pluripotency

Open access
Rao, Sridhar, Zhen, Shao, Roumiantsev, Sergei, McDonald, Lindsay T., Yuan, Guo-Cheng, Orkin, Stuart H.·2010·Molecular and Cellular Biology

Abstract

Murine embryonic stem (ES) cells are defined by continuous self-renewal and pluripotency. A diverse repertoire of protein isoforms arising from alternative splicing is expressed in ES cells without defined biological roles. Sall4, a transcription factor essential for pluripotency, exists as two isoforms (Sall4a and Sall4b). Both isoforms can form homodimers and a heterodimer with each other, and each can interact with Nanog. By genomewide location analysis, we determined that Sall4a and Sall4b have overlapping, but not identical binding sites within the ES cell genome. In addition, Sall4b, but not Sall4a, binds preferentially to highly expressed loci in ES cells. Sall4a and Sall4b binding sites are distinguished by both epigenetic marks at target loci and their clustering with binding sites of other pluripotency factors. When ES cells expressing a single isoform of Sall4 are generated, Sall4b alone could maintain the pluripotent state, although it could not completely suppress all differentiation markers. Sall4a and Sall4b collaborate in maintenance of the pluripotent state but play distinct roles. Our work is novel in establishing such isoform-specific differences in ES cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mcb.00419-10

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 173

Authors
Rao, S., Zhen, S., Roumiantsev, S., McDonald, L. T., Yuan, G.-C., & Orkin, S. H.
Affiliations
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Orkin, Stuart H.
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Biology
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
30
Issue
22
Pages
5364-5380
ISSN
  • 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5549
OpenAlex
W2114951390
Cited by
173
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (5K08HL87951, K08HL087951)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
SALL4, protein isoforms, alternative splicing, embryonic stem cells, pluripotency, Nanog, transcription factor binding sites, epigenetic modifications, self-renewal, differentiation, isoform-specific function
MeSH terms
Nanog Homeobox Protein, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Transcription Factors, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Dimerization, Protein Isoforms, Protein Structure, Quaternary, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Epigenesis, Genetic, Microarray Analysis, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review