Enhancer-Promoter Communication Is Regulated by Insulator Pairing in a Drosophila Model Bigenic Locus
Open accessAbstract
The complexity of regulatory systems in higher eukaryotes, featuring many distantly located enhancers that nonetheless properly activate the target promoters, has prompted the hypothesis that the action of enhancers should be restricted by insulators. Continuing our research on the functional role of insulators and the consequences of their interaction in Drosophila, we studied the interplay of different Su(Hw)-dependent Drosophila insulators. The set of transgenic constructs comprised two consecutive genes (yellow and white) with their enhancers and insulator elements differently arranged in between and/or around the gene(s). All insulators were found to interact in twin or mixed tandems, demonstrating the bypass phenomenon. However, insulator pairing around a gene did not always improve its isolation from an outside enhancer. On the other hand, merely two insulator elements (identical or different) in appropriate positions can permit the expression of one gene but not the gene next to it or, conversely, largely block the transcription of the first gene, while allowing full enhancement of the second, or make them behave similarly. Thus, the results of this study support the model that loop formation by insulators is an essential component of insulator action on a positive and negative regulation of an enhancer-promoter communication.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Contacts between architectural proteins can modulate the spatial organization of the genome, including keeping enhancers close to promoters.
“In model experiments, it was convincingly shown that contacts between these proteins can modulate the spatial organization of the genome, including keeping enhancers close to promoters [84,91,92].”
From Enhancer Function in the 3D Genome (2023) · cites this paper as [91]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enhancer Function in the 3D Genome
Razin, S. V., Ulianov, S. V., & Iarovaia, O. V. (2023) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes14061277 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maksimenko, O., Golovnin, A., & Georgiev, P.
- Affiliations
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Georgiev, Pavel
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 5469-5477
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- PMC
- PMC2519739
- OpenAlex
- W2096071349
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Russian Foundation for Basic Research
- Russian Academy of Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Keywords
- enhancer-promoter interactions, Drosophila, chromatin looping, gene expression regulation, cis-regulatory elements
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Models, Genetic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Genes, Insect, Insulator Elements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review