Cited by 73Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerHedgehog Signaling Pathway StudiesReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Analysis of endogenous LRP6 function reveals a novel feedback mechanism by which Wnt negatively regulates its receptor

Open access
Khan, Zahid, Vijayakumar, Sapna, de la Torre, Teresa Villanueva, Rotolo, Sabrina, Bafico, Anna·2007·Molecular and Cellular Biology

Abstract

The canonical Wnt pathway plays a crucial role in embryonic development, and its deregulation is involved in human diseases. The LRP6 single-span transmembrane coreceptor is essential for transmission of canonical Wnt signaling. However, due to the lack of immunological reagents, our understanding of LRP6 structure and function has relied on studies involving its overexpression, and regulation of the endogenous receptor by the Wnt ligand has remained unexplored. Using a highly sensitive and specific antibody to LRP6, we demonstrate that the endogenous receptor is modified by N-glycosylation and is phosphorylated in response to Wnt stimulation in a sustained yet ligand-dependent manner. Moreover, following triggering by Wnt, endogenous LRP6 is internalized and recycled back to the cellular membrane within hours of the initial stimulus. Finally, we have identified a novel feedback mechanism by which Wnt, acting through beta-catenin, negatively regulates LRP6 at the mRNA level. Together, these findings contribute significantly to our understanding of LRP6 function and uncover a new level of regulation of Wnt signaling. In light of the direct role that the Wnt pathway plays in human bone diseases and malignancies, our findings may support the development of novel therapeutic approaches that target Wnt signaling through LRP6.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mcb.00773-07

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies reported pathway activation without detection of nuclear β-catenin, while others described negative feedback loops that activate pathway repressors or suppress pathway activators in Wnt-signaling.

    “While some studies reported pathway activation without detection of nuclear β-catenin, others described negative feedback loops that activate pathway repressors or suppress pathway activators in Wnt-signaling (33).”

    From Wnt-Pathway Activation in Two Molecular Classes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Experimental Modulation by Sorafenib (2012) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Discussion (page not provided) identifies a Wnt-driven negative feedback mechanism that reduces expression of LRP6, a pathway-activating receptor. The paper does not report pathway activation without detection of nuclear β-catenin; it describes β-catenin translocation to the nucleus during canonical signaling. It also does not show activation of a pathway repressor. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]30. Russell, D. W., T. Yamamoto, W. J. Schneider, C. J. Slaughter, M. S. Brown, and J. L. Goldstein. 1983. cDNA cloning of the bovine low density lipoprotein receptor: feedback regulation of a receptor mRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 7501-7505.
  2. [37]37. Wiley, H. S. 2003. Trafficking of the ErbB receptors and its influence on signaling. Exp. Cell Res. 284: 78-88.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, Z., Vijayakumar, S., de la Torre, T. V., Rotolo, S., & Bafico, A.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Department of Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029
Corresponding author
Bafico, Anna
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Biology
Published
2007-10-01
Volume
27
Issue
20
Pages
7291-7301
ISSN
  • 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5549
OpenAlex
W2106281886
Cited by
73
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01ca121119-01a1)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01 CA121119, 1 R01 CA121119-01A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
LRP6, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, N-glycosylation, receptor phosphorylation, β-catenin, feedback mechanisms
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Cell Line, Humans, Ligands, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Receptors, LDL, Repressor Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Signal Transduction, Dimerization, Feedback, Physiological, Wnt Proteins, beta Catenin, Mice, Axin Protein, Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-6, Wnt3 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review