A Two-Step, PU.1-Dependent Mechanism for Developmentally Regulated Chromatin Remodeling and Transcription of the c-fms Gene
Open accessAbstract
Hematopoietic stem cells and multipotent progenitors exhibit low-level transcription and partial chromatin reorganization of myeloid cell-specific genes including the c-fms (csf1R) locus. Expression of the c-fms gene is dependent on the Ets family transcription factor PU.1 and is upregulated during myeloid differentiation, enabling committed macrophage precursors to respond to colony-stimulating factor 1. To analyze molecular mechanisms underlying the transcriptional priming and developmental upregulation of the c-fms gene, we have utilized myeloid progenitors lacking the transcription factor PU.1. PU.1 can bind to sites in both the c-fms promoter and the c-fms intronic regulatory element (FIRE enhancer). Unlike wild-type progenitors, the PU.1(-/-) cells are unable to express c-fms or initiate macrophage differentiation. When PU.1 was reexpressed in mutant progenitors, the chromatin structure of the c-fms promoter was rapidly reorganized. In contrast, assembly of transcription factors at FIRE, acquisition of active histone marks, and high levels of c-fms transcription occurred with significantly slower kinetics. We demonstrate that the reason for this differential activation was that PU.1 was required to promote induction and binding of a secondary transcription factor, Egr-2, which is important for FIRE enhancer activity. These data suggest that the c-fms promoter is maintained in a primed state by PU.1 in progenitor cells and that at FIRE PU.1 functions with another transcription factor to direct full activation of the c-fms locus in differentiated myeloid cells. The two-step mechanism of developmental gene activation that we describe here may be utilized to regulate gene activity in a variety of developmental pathways.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Egr2 can collaborate with PU.1 in positive regulation when co-bound with it, but has also been implicated as a PU.1-stimulated repressor of the mir17~92 complex.
“Egr2, for example, can collaborate with PU.1 in positive regulation when co-bound with it (106), but has also been implicated as a PU.1-stimulated repressor of the mir17~92 complex (107).”
From Mechanisms of Action of Hematopoietic Transcription Factor PU.1 in Initiation of T-Cell Development (2019) · cites this paper as [106]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Krysinska, H., Hoogenkamp, M., Ingram, R., Wilson, N., Tagoh, H., Laslo, P., Singh, H., & Bonifer, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bonifer, Constanze
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-02-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 878-887
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- PMC
- PMC1800675
- OpenAlex
- W2170487338
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (G18655, BBS/B/07438)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Keywords
- c-fms, CSF1R, PU.1, EGR2, chromatin remodeling, transcriptional priming, myeloid differentiation, hematopoietic stem cells, macrophage precursors, colony-stimulating factor 1, histone modifications, transcription factor binding
- MeSH terms
- Proto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1, Animals, Base Sequence, Deoxyribonuclease I, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Histones, Kinetics, Methylation, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, RNA Polymerase II, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Transcriptional Activation, Trans-Activators, Genes, fms, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, TATA-Box Binding Protein, NIH 3T3 Cells, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Mice, Early Growth Response Protein 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review