Specific sequences in the fragile X syndrome protein FMR1 and the FXR proteins mediate their binding to 60S ribosomal subunits and the interactions among them
Open accessAbstract
Fragile X syndrome, the most common form of hereditary mental retardation, usually results from lack of expression of the FMR1 gene. The FMR1 protein is a cytoplasmic RNA-binding protein. The RNA-binding activity of FMR1 is an essential feature of FMR1, as fragile X syndrome can also result from the expression of mutant FMR1 protein that is impaired in RNA binding. Recently, we described two novel cytoplasmic proteins, FXR1 and FXR2, which are both very similar in amino acid sequence to FMR1 and which also interact strongly with FMR1 and with each other. To understand the function of FMR1 and the FXR proteins, we carried out cell fractionation and sedimentation experiments with monoclonal antibodies to these proteins to characterize the complexes they form. Here, we report that the FMR1 and FXR proteins are associated with ribosomes, predominantly with 60S large ribosomal subunits. The FXR proteins are associated with 60S ribosomal subunits even in cells that lack FMR1 and that are derived from a fragile X syndrome patient, indicating that FMR1 is not required for this association. We delineated the regions of FMR1 that mediate its binding to 60S ribosomal subunits and the interactions among the FMR1-FXR family members. Both regions contain sequences predicted to have a high propensity to form coiled coil interactions, and the sequences are highly evolutionarily conserved in this protein family. The association of the FMR1, FXR1, and FXR2 proteins with ribosomes suggests they have functions in translation or mRNA stability.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FMRP co-immunoprecipitated with rpP0-containing complexes, as did ribosomal proteins rpL5 and rpS6, demonstrating a direct association of FMRP with ribosome-containing complexes.
“FMRP co-IP’d with rpP0-containing complexes, as did the ribosomal proteins rpL5 and rpS6 (Figure 7H), demonstrating a direct association of FMRP with ribosome-containing complexes, reminiscent of previous findings in cultured cells (Khandjian et al., 1996; Siomi et al., 1996).”
From FMRP Stalls Ribosomal Translocation on mRNAs Linked to Synaptic Function and Autism (2011) · cites this paper as Siomi et al., 1996
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 271
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [30]30. Nussbaum, N. L., and D. H. Ledbetter. 1995. Fragile X syndrome, p. 795810. In C. R. Scriver, A. Beauder, W. S. Sly, and D. Valle (ed.), Metabolic basis of inherited disease, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
- [32]32. Oostra, B. A., P. J. Willems, and A. J. M. H. Verkerk. 1993. Fragile X syndrome: a growing gene, p. 45-75. In K. E. Davies and S. M. Tilghman (ed.), Genomic analysis: genome mapping and neurological disorders, vol. 6. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
- [43]43. Spirin, A. S. 1990. Ribosome preparation and cell-free protein synthesis, p. 56-70. In W. E. Hill, A. Dahlberg, R. A. Garrett, P. B. Moore, D. Schlessinger, and J. R. Warner (ed.), The ribosome: structure, function, & evolution. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
- Authors
- Siomi, M. C., Zhang, Y., Siomi, H., & Dreyfuss, G.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3825-3832
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- PMC
- PMC231379
- OpenAlex
- W2110395594
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Keywords
- fragile X syndrome, FXR1, FXR2, 60S ribosomal subunit, ribosome binding, RNA-binding proteins, coiled-coil interactions, protein-protein interaction, protein-protein complex formation, translation (biology), mRNA stability, hereditary intellectual disability
- MeSH terms
- Receptor, Farnesoid X-Activated, Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA-Binding Proteins, Biological Evolution, Exons, Fragile X Syndrome, HeLa Cells, Humans, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Ribosomes, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, RNA-Binding Proteins, Conserved Sequence, Sequence Deletion, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review