Cited by 98Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Point Mutations in the WD40 Domain of Eed Block Its Interaction with Ezh2

Open access
Denisenko, Oleg, Shnyreva, Maria, Suzuki, Hideaki, Bomsztyk, Karol·1998·Molecular and Cellular Biology

Abstract

The Polycomb group proteins are involved in maintenance of the silenced state of several developmentally regulated genes. These proteins form large aggregates with different subunit compositions. To explore the nature of these complexes and their function, we used the full-length Eed (embryonic ectoderm development) protein, a mammalian homolog of the Drosophila Polycomb group protein Esc, as a bait in the yeast two-hybrid screen. Several strongly interacting cDNA clones were isolated. The cloned cDNAs all encoded the 150- to 200-amino-acid N-terminal fragment of the mammalian homolog of the Drosophila Enhancer of zeste [E(z)] protein, Ezh2. The full-length Ezh2 bound strongly to Eed in vitro, and Eed coimmunoprecipitated with Ezh2 from murine 70Z/3 cell extracts, confirming the interaction between these proteins observed in yeast. Mutations T1031A and T1040C in one of the WD40 repeats of Eed, which account for the hypomorphic and lethal phenotype of eed in mouse development, blocked binding of Ezh2 to Eed in a two-hybrid interaction in yeast and in mammalian cells. These mutations also blocked the interaction between these proteins in vitro. In mammalian cells, the Gal4-Eed fusion protein represses the activity of a promoter bearing Gal4 DNA elements. The N-terminal fragment of the Ezh2 protein abolished the transcriptional repressor activity of Gal4-Eed protein when they were coexpressed in mammalian cells. Eed and Ezh2 were also found to bind RNA in vitro, and RNA altered the interaction between these proteins. These findings suggest that Polycomb group proteins Eed and Ezh2 functionally interact in mammalian cells, an interaction that is mediated by the WD40-containing domain of Eed protein.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mcb.18.10.5634

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors targeted exon 6 because a prior report showed that a one-base mutation there prevents EED from interacting with EZH1/2 and produces an Eed-null phenotype.

    “In brief, exon 6 was chosen for gene deletion as a single base pair mutation in this exon was previously shown to disrupt the interaction of EED with EZH1/2 proteins, thus resulting in an Eed-null phenotype61,62.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 98

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Paro R, Messmer S, Moehrle, Orlando V, Zink D. 17th International Congress of Genetics, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 1993. Regulation of stable gene expression at the higher-order chromatin level. Genetics and the Understanding of Life. [Google Scholar]

Authors
Denisenko, O., Shnyreva, M., Suzuki, H., & Bomsztyk, K.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Bomsztyk, Karol
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Biology
Published
1998-10
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
5634-5642
ISSN
  • 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5549
OpenAlex
W1832862155
Cited by
98
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 45134, R01GM045134)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK045978, DK-45978, R37DK045978)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
EED, EZH2, Polycomb group proteins, WD40 domain, protein-protein interaction, point mutations, transcriptional repression, RNA binding, gene silencing, Enhancer of zeste
MeSH terms
Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 Protein, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Cell Line, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Nuclear Proteins, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Repressor Proteins, RNA, Yeasts, Gene Expression, Point Mutation, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Jurkat Cells, COS Cells, Drosophila Proteins, Mice, Rats, Polycomb Repressive Complex 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review