The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternative splicing of chicken fibronectin in embryos and in normal and transformed cells.
Open accessAbstract
To study the alternative splicing of fibronectin during embryogenesis and oncogenic transformation, we isolated cDNA clones of chicken fibronectin. The partial amino acid sequence deduced from sequencing of these clones showed that, overall, chicken fibronectin is approximately 80% identical with mammalian fibronectins. However, two of the three known regions of alternative splicing differed from this average. The V region was significantly more divergent, and RNA from embryonic chicken liver showed a pattern of V exon splicing which was distinct from that seen in human or rat fibronectins. In contrast, the EIIIB segment was very highly conserved (96%). As in mammals, this segment and another (EIIIA) were alternatively spliced in a cell-type-specific fashion. EIIIA+ and EIIIB+ species were almost absent in liver but predominated in total embryo RNA at all times from 2.5 to 11 days postfertilization. We also examined the possible contributions of fibronectin splicing and integrin receptor expression to the loss of fibronectin on oncogenic transformation. We detected little change in fibronectin splicing, other than a slight increase in representation of EIIIB+ species in fibroblasts after transformation by Rous sarcoma virus. It was also established that the overall reduction in fibronectin mRNA level observed after transformation was not accompanied by a decrease in integrin mRNA levels, indicating that fibronectin and integrin receptors are not coordinately regulated at the transcriptional level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Humphries, M. J., Akiyama, S. K., Komoriya, A., Olden, K., & Yamada, K. M. (1986) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.103.6.2637 · Cited by 438
Cited by
RGD AND OTHER RECOGNITION SEQUENCES FOR INTEGRINS
Ruoslahti, E. (1996) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.697 · Cited by 3,191
Garcı́a, A. J., Vega, M. D., & Boettiger, D. (1999) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.10.3.785 · Cited by 659
Dedifferentiation and Proliferation of Surviving Epithelial Cells in Acute Renal Failure
Bonventre, J. V. (2003) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1097/01.asn.0000067652.51441.21 · Cited by 593
Two contrary functions of tenascin: Dissection of the active sites by recombinant tenascin fragments
Spring, J., Beck, K., & Chiquet-Ehrismann, R. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90294-8 · Cited by 413
New insights into form and function of fibronectin splice variants
White, E., Baralle, F., & Muro, A. (2008) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.2388 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Norton, P. A., & Hynes, R. O.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1987-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4297-4307
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W2107839231
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative splicing of chicken fibronectin in embryos and in normal and transformed cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.7.12.4297
- The paper
- Norton, P. A., & Hynes, R. O. (1987). Alternative splicing of chicken fibronectin in embryos and in normal and transformed cells. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.7.12.4297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.