The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fungal Diversity Revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 Million Species
Open accessAbstract
The question of how many species of Fungi there are has occasioned much speculation, with figures mostly posited from around half a million to 10 million, and in one extreme case even a sizable portion of the spectacular number of 1 trillion. Here we examine new evidence from various sources to derive an updated estimate of global fungal diversity. The rates and patterns in the description of new species from the 1750s show no sign of approaching an asymptote and even accelerated in the 2010s after the advent of molecular approaches to species delimitation. Species recognition studies of (semi-)cryptic species hidden in morpho-species complexes suggest a weighted average ratio of about an order of magnitude for the number of species recognized after and before such studies. New evidence also comes from extrapolations of plant:fungus ratios, with information now being generated from environmental sequence studies, including comparisons of molecular and fieldwork data from the same sites. We further draw attention to undescribed species awaiting discovery in biodiversity hot spots in the tropics, little-explored habitats (such as lichen-inhabiting fungi), and material in collections awaiting study. We conclude that the commonly cited estimate of 1.5 million species is conservative and that the actual range is properly estimated at 2.2 to 3.8 million. With 120,000 currently accepted species, it appears that at best just 8%, and in the worst case scenario just 3%, are named so far. Improved estimates hinge particularly on reliable statistical and phylogenetic approaches to analyze the rapidly increasing amount of environmental sequence data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?
Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G. B., & Worm, B. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127 · Cited by 3,045
What we know and don’t know about Earth's missing biodiversity
Scheffers, B. R., Joppa, L. N., Pimm, S. L., & Laurance, W. F. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.008 · Cited by 437
CRYPTIC SPECIATION IN THE COSMOPOLITAN AND CLONAL HUMAN PATHOGENIC FUNGUS ASPERGILLUS FUMIGATUS
Pringle, A., Baker, D. M., Platt, J. L., Wares, J. P., Latgé, J. P., & Taylor, J. W. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01059.x · Cited by 267
Brown, E. M., McTaggart, L. R., Zhang, S. X., Low, D. E., Stevens, D. A., & Richardson, S. E. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059237 · Cited by 148
Cited by
Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Self-citationAntifungal activity of thiosemicarbazones, bis(thiosemicarbazones), and their metal complexes
Bajaj, K., Buchanan, R. M., & Grapperhaus, C. A. (2021) · Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2021.111620 · Cited by 122
Mushroom poisoning epidemiology in the United States
Brandenburg, W. E., & Ward, K. J. (2018) · Mycologia · doi:10.1080/00275514.2018.1479561 · Cited by 105
Van Court, R. C., Wiseman, M. S., Meyer, K. W., Ballhorn, D. J., Amses, K. R., Slot, J. C., Dentinger, B. T. M., Garibay-Orijel, R., & Uehling, J. K. (2022) · Fungal Biology · doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2022.01.003 · Cited by 94
Urquhart, A. S., Vogan, A. A., Gardiner, D. M., & Idnurm, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2214521120 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawksworth, D. L., & Lücking, R.
- Venue
- Microbiology Spectrum
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2017-08-25
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2165-0497 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2740085246
- Cited by
- 1,332
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 79.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fungal Diversity Revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 Million Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0052-2016
- The paper
- Hawksworth, D. L., & Lücking, R. (2017). Fungal Diversity Revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 Million Species. Microbiology Spectrum. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0052-2016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.