Cited by 1,669Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFungal and yeast genetics researchPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Physiological and genetic responses of bacteria to osmotic stress

Open access
Csonka, L N·1989·Microbiological Reviews

Abstract

The capacity of organisms to respond to fluctuations in their osmotic environments is an important physiological process that determines their abilities to thrive in a variety of habitats. The primary response of bacteria to exposure to a high osmotic environment is the accumulation of certain solutes, K+, glutamate, trehalose, proline, and glycinebetaine, at concentrations that are proportional to the osmolarity of the medium. The supposed function of these solutes is to maintain the osmolarity of the cytoplasm at a value greater than the osmolarity of the medium and thus provide turgor pressure within the cells. Accumulation of these metabolites is accomplished by de novo synthesis or by uptake from the medium. Production of proteins that mediate accumulation or uptake of these metabolites is under osmotic control. This review is an account of the processes that mediate adaptation of bacteria to changes in their osmotic environment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mr.53.1.121-147.1989

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • B. subtilis imports compatible solutes such as glycine betaine and proline to rebalance the ionic strength of the cytoplasm.

    “To rebalance the ionic strength of the cytoplasm (45), B. subtilis imports compatible solutes such as glycine betaine (GB) and proline (46, 47).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Csonka, L. N.
Corresponding author
Csonka, L N
Venue
Microbiological Reviews
Published
1989-03
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
121-147
ISSN
0146-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137180677
Cited by
1,669
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 44
FWCI
36.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbiological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM 3194401)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Keywords
osmotic stress, solute accumulation, potassium, glutamate, trehalose, proline, betaine, turgor pressure, osmoprotectants
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Osmolar Concentration, Osmotic Pressure, Water-Electrolyte Balance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review