The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methanotrophic bacteria.
Open accessAbstract
Methane-utilizing bacteria (methanotrophs) are a diverse group of gram-negative bacteria that are related to other members of the Proteobacteria. These bacteria are classified into three groups based on the pathways used for assimilation of formaldehyde, the major source of cell carbon, and other physiological and morphological features. The type I and type X methanotrophs are found within the gamma subdivision of the Proteobacteria and employ the ribulose monophosphate pathway for formaldehyde assimilation, whereas type II methanotrophs, which employ the serine pathway for formaldehyde assimilation, form a coherent cluster within the beta subdivision of the Proteobacteria. Methanotrophic bacteria are ubiquitous. The growth of type II bacteria appears to be favored in environments that contain relatively high levels of methane, low levels of dissolved oxygen, and limiting concentrations of combined nitrogen and/or copper. Type I methanotrophs appear to be dominant in environments in which methane is limiting and combined nitrogen and copper levels are relatively high. These bacteria serve as biofilters for the oxidation of methane produced in anaerobic environments, and when oxygen is present in soils, atmospheric methane is oxidized. Their activities in nature are greatly influenced by agricultural practices and other human activities. Recent evidence indicates that naturally occurring, uncultured methanotrophs represent new genera. Methanotrophs that are capable of oxidizing methane at atmospheric levels exhibit methane oxidation kinetics different from those of methanotrophs available in pure cultures. A limited number of methanotrophs have the genetic capacity to synthesize a soluble methane monooxygenase which catalyzes the rapid oxidation of environmental pollutants including trichloroethylene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review
Le Mer, J., & Roger, P. (2001) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/s1164-5563(01)01067-6 · Cited by 2,123
Stable-isotope probing as a tool in microbial ecology
Radajewski, S., Ineson, P., Parekh, N. R., & Murrell, J. C. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001054 · Cited by 1,252
Microbial degradation of organophosphorus compounds
Singh, B. K., & Walker, A. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00018.x · Cited by 1,013
Bacterial Degradation of Aromatic Compounds
Seo, J.-S., Keum, Y.-S., & Li, Q. X. (2009) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph6010278 · Cited by 968
Semrau, J. D., DiSpirito, A. A., & Yoon, S. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00212.x · Cited by 760
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanson, R. S., & Hanson, T. E.
- Venue
- Microbiological reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 439-471
- ISSN
- 0146-0749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4253646848
- Cited by
- 2,772
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methanotrophic bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.60.2.439-471.1996
- The paper
- Hanson, R. S., & Hanson, T. E. (1996). Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiological reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.60.2.439-471.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.