The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cytokinesis in Bacteria
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Work on two diverse rod-shaped bacteria, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, has defined a set of about 10 conserved proteins that are important for cell division in a wide range of eubacteria. These proteins are directed to the division site by the combination of two negative regulatory systems. Nucleoid occlusion is a poorly understood mechanism whereby the nucleoid prevents division in the cylindrical part of the cell, until chromosome segregation has occurred near midcell. The Min proteins prevent division in the nucleoid-free spaces near the cell poles in a manner that is beginning to be understood in cytological and biochemical terms. The hierarchy whereby the essential division proteins assemble at the midcell division site has been worked out for both E. coli and B. subtilis. They can be divided into essentially three classes depending on their position in the hierarchy and, to a certain extent, their subcellular localization. FtsZ is a cytosolic tubulin-like protein that polymerizes into an oligomeric structure that forms the initial ring at midcell. FtsA is another cytosolic protein that is related to actin, but its precise function is unclear. The cytoplasmic proteins are linked to the membrane by putative membrane anchor proteins, such as ZipA of E. coli and possibly EzrA of B. subtilis, which have a single membrane span but a cytoplasmic C-terminal domain. The remaining proteins are either integral membrane proteins or transmembrane proteins with their major domains outside the cell. The functions of most of these proteins are unclear with the exception of at least one penicillin-binding protein, which catalyzes a key step in cell wall synthesis in the division septum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cell division inhibitors SulA and MinCD prevent formation of the FtsZ ring
Bi, E., & Lutkenhaus, J. (1993) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.175.4.1118-1125.1993 · Cited by 407
Cited by
Streptomyces morphogenetics: dissecting differentiation in a filamentous bacterium
Flärdh, K., & Buttner, M. J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1968 · Cited by 667
Bernhardt, T. G., & de Boer, P. A. J. (2005) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.04.012 · Cited by 522
Cabeen, M. T., & Jacobs-Wagner, C. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1205 · Cited by 494
Vieler, A., Wu, G., Tsai, C.-H., Bullard, B., Cornish, A. J., Harvey, C., Reca, I.-B., Thornburg, C., Achawanantakun, R., Buehl, C. J., et al. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003064 · Cited by 458
Murein (peptidoglycan) structure, architecture and biosynthesis in Escherichia coli
Vollmer, W., & Bertsche, U. (2008) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.06.007 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Errington, J., Daniel, R. A., & Scheffers, D.-J.
- Venue
- Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-65
- ISSN
- 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5557
- OpenAlex
- W2115004879
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytokinesis in Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.67.1.52-65.2003
- The paper
- Errington, J., Daniel, R. A., & Scheffers, D.-J. (2003). Cytokinesis in Bacteria. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.67.1.52-65.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.