Cited by 2,685Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactantsLipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Mechanisms of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons

Open access
Sikkema, J, de Bont, J A, Poolman, B·1995·Microbiological Reviews

Abstract

Microbial transformations of cyclic hydrocarbons have received much attention during the past three decades. Interest in the degradation of environmental pollutants as well as in applications of microorganisms in the catalysis of chemical reactions has stimulated research in this area. The metabolic pathways of various aromatics, cycloalkanes, and terpenes in different microorganisms have been elucidated, and the genetics of several of these routes have been clarified. The toxicity of these compounds to microorganisms is very important in the microbial degradation of hydrocarbons, but not many researchers have studied the mechanism of this toxic action. In this review, we present general ideas derived from the various reports mentioning toxic effects. Most importantly, lipophilic hydrocarbons accumulate in the membrane lipid bilayer, affecting the structural and functional properties of these membranes. As a result of accumulated hydrocarbon molecules, the membrane loses its integrity, and an increase in permeability to protons and ions has been observed in several instances. Consequently, dissipation of the proton motive force and impairment of intracellular pH homeostasis occur. In addition to the effects of lipophilic compounds on the lipid part of the membrane, proteins embedded in the membrane are affected. The effects on the membrane-embedded proteins probably result to a large extent from changes in the lipid environment; however, direct effects of lipophilic compounds on membrane proteins have also been observed. Finally, the effectiveness of changes in membrane lipid composition, modification of outer membrane lipopolysaccharide, altered cell wall constituents, and active excretion systems in reducing the membrane concentrations of lipophilic compounds is discussed. Also, the adaptations (e.g., increase in lipid ordering, change in lipid/protein ratio) that compensate for the changes in membrane structure are treated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mr.59.2.201-222.1995

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carvacrol acts on microbial cells and causes structural and functional damage to their membranes that results in increased permeability.

    “Similar to thymol, carvacrol acts on microbial cells and causes structural and functional damage to their membranes [26] that results in increased permeability.”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [26]

  • Cyclic monoterpenes preferentially partition from an aqueous phase into membrane structures due to their lipophilic character.

    “Sikkema et al. [26,114] showed that as a result of their lipophilic character, cyclic monoterpenes are preferentially reparted from an aqueous phase into membrane structures.”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [26]

  • Treating E. coli O157:H7 with oregano essential oil, which is rich in thymol and carvacrol, resulted in the collapse of cells after the loss of their contents.

    “Observations made by electron microscopy showed that treating E. coli O157:H7 with oregano EO, which is rich in thymol and carvacrol, resulted in the collapse of cells after the loss of their contents [4,26,115].”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [26]

  • Many contaminants including BTEX are lipophilic compounds that readily dissolve in the cytoplasmic membrane and affect membrane fluidity.

    “Many contaminants including BTEX are lipophilic compounds that readily dissolve in the cytoplasmic membrane affecting membrane fluidity (Sikkema et al., 1995).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 342 · Cited by 2,685

Authors
Sikkema, J., de Bont, J. A., & Poolman, B.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Department of Food Science, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.
Venue
Microbiological Reviews
Published
1995-06
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
201-222
ISSN
0146-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115407301
Cited by
2,685
References
342
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 140 · 2019: 121 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 130 · 2015: 145 · 2014: 158 · 2013: 131 · 2012: 135
FWCI
37.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbiological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
hydrocarbon toxicity, membrane toxicity, lipid bilayers, membrane permeability, proton motive force, intracellular pH homeostasis, membrane proteins, membrane lipid composition, lipopolysaccharide, cell wall, efflux systems, lipid ordering, lipid/protein ratio, microbial adaptation
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Cell Membrane, Fungi, Hydrocarbons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review