Cited by 4Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyMicrobial metabolism and enzyme function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Signal sequences target enzymes and structural proteins to bacterial microcompartments and are critical for microcompartment formation

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Spatial organization of pathway enzymes has emerged as a promising tool to address several challenges in metabolic engineering, such as flux imbalances and off-target product formation. Bacterial microcompartments (MCPs) are a spatial organization strategy used natively by many bacteria to encapsulate metabolic pathways that produce toxic, volatile intermediates. Several recent studies have focused on engineering MCPs to encapsulate heterologous pathways of interest, but how this engineering affects MCP assembly and function is poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the role of signal sequences, short domains that target proteins to the MCP core, in the assembly of 1,2-propanediol utilization (Pdu) MCPs. We characterized two novel Pdu signal sequences on the structural proteins PduM and PduB, which constitute the first report of metabolosome signal sequences on structural proteins rather than enzymes. We then explored the role of enzymatic and structural Pdu signal sequences on MCP assembly by deleting their encoding sequences from the genome alone and in combination. Deleting enzymatic signal sequences decreased the MCP formation, but this defect could be recovered in some cases by overexpressing genes encoding the knocked-out signal sequence fused to a heterologous protein. By contrast, deleting structural signal sequences caused similar defects to knocking out the genes encoding the full-length PduM and PduB proteins. Our results contribute to a growing understanding of how MCPs form and function in bacteria and provide strategies to mitigate assembly disruption when encapsulating heterologous pathways in MCPs. IMPORTANCE: Spatially organizing biosynthetic pathway enzymes is a promising strategy to increase pathway throughput and yield. Bacterial microcompartments (MCPs) are proteinaceous organelles that many bacteria natively use as a spatial organization strategy to encapsulate niche metabolic pathways, providing significant metabolic benefits. Encapsulating heterologous pathways of interest in MCPs could confer these benefits to industrially relevant pathways. Here, we investigate the role of signal sequences, short domains that target proteins for encapsulation in MCPs, in the assembly of 1,2-propanediol utilization (Pdu) MCPs. We characterize two novel signal sequences on structural proteins, constituting the first Pdu signal sequences found on structural proteins rather than enzymes, and perform knockout studies to compare the impacts of enzymatic and structural signal sequences on MCP assembly. Our results demonstrate that enzymatic and structural signal sequences play critical but distinct roles in Pdu MCP assembly and provide design rules for engineering MCPs while minimizing disruption to MCP assembly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/msphere.00962-24

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. 10.1126/science.1193990 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.02.011 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.09.003 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.ymben.2010.03.004 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41579-021-00600-0 · DOI
  6. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-092222-020832 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nbt.1557 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.ymben.2010.01.003 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/nar/gkr888 · DOI
  10. 10.1128/AEM.02578-12 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41467-022-30608-w · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1128/JB.181.19.5967-5975.1999 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.tim.2014.10.003 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41467-021-24126-4 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.08.009 · DOI
  16. 10.1128/JB.188.8.2865-2874.2006 · DOI
  17. 10.1128/JB.01925-07 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s41598-018-26399-0 · DOI
  19. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005525 · DOI
  20. 10.1128/JB.181.18.5615-5623.1999 · DOI
  21. 10.1128/JB.185.9.2802-2810.2003 · DOI
  22. 10.1128/JB.185.17.5086-5095.2003 · DOI
  23. 10.1128/JB.186.23.7881-7887.2004 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047144 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.04.008 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/acscatal.8b00986 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/sb4001118 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nchembio.2535 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.02.007 · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.0913199107 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/19420889.2015.1039755 · DOI
  32. 10.1128/jb.00576-21 · DOI
  33. 10.1128/JB.00575-10 · DOI
  34. 10.1128/JB.00056-15 · DOI
  35. 10.1128/JB.05661-11 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1998.tb00387.x · DOI
  37. 10.1074/jbc.M115.651919 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/pro.3144 · DOI
  39. 10.1074/jbc.M112.355305 · DOI
  40. 10.1073/pnas.1207516109 · DOI
  41. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002399 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.bej.2020.107496 · DOI
  43. 10.1128/JB.06529-11 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/s41467-020-15888-4 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00164-7 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  49. 10.1128/JB.00785-16 · DOI
  50. 10.1371/journal.pone.0113814 · DOI
  51. 10.1128/jb.174.7.2267-2272.1992 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/s41467-020-19280-0 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.11.020 · DOI
  54. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01699 · DOI
  55. 10.1371/journal.pone.0226395 · DOI
  56. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005553 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/nprot.2008.227 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.gene.2006.04.018 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, E. R., Kennedy, N. W., Mills, C. E., Liang, S., Chandrasekar, S., Nichols, T. M., Rybnicky, G. A., & Tullman-Ercek, D.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University
Venue
mSphere
Published
2025-05-27
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
e0096224-e0096224
ISSN
2379-5042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409484492
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mSphere (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DGE-2021900, DMR-2308691, DBI-2150269)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0022180)
  • U.S. Army (W52P1J2193023)
  • National Institutes of Health (5T32GM140995-04)
  • NSF | National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (DGE-1842165)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
Keywords
bacterial microcompartments, signal peptide, structural proteins, metabolic engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review