Cited by 31Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchGut microbiota and healthTryptophan and brain disorders

Clostridioides difficile infection dysregulates brain dopamine metabolism

Open access
Vinithakumari, Akhil A., Padhi, Piyush, Hernandez, Belen, Lin, Susanne Je-Han, Dunkerson-Kurzhumov, Aaron, Showman, Lucas, Breitzman, Matthew, Stokes, Caroline +11 more·2022·Microbiology Spectrum

Abstract

The gut-brain axis is thought to play a significant role in the development and manifestation of neurologic diseases. This study reports significant alterations in the brain dopamine metabolism in mice infected with C. difficile, an important pathogen that overgrows in the gut after prolonged antibiotic therapy. Such alterations in specific brain regions may have an effect on the precipitation or manifestation of neurodevelopmental disorders in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/spectrum.00073-22

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C. difficile has been shown to alter the metabolism of dopamine and interfere with cognitive functions that involve the neuromodulatory action of dopamine, such as motivation and memory consolidation.

    “C. difficile has been shown to alter the metabolism of dopamine and interfere with cognitive functions that involve the neuromodulatory action of dopamine, such as motivation and memory consolidation (456).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 31

Authors
Vinithakumari, A. A., Padhi, P., Hernandez, B., Lin, S. J.-H., Dunkerson-Kurzhumov, A., Showman, L., Breitzman, M., Stokes, C., Sulaiman, Y., Tangudu, C., Kuttappan, D. A., Muyyarikkandy, M. S., Willette, A. A., Phillips, G. J., Anantharam, V., Perera, A., Sponseller, B. A., Kanthasamy, A., & Mooyottu, S.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Mooyottu, Shankumar
Venue
Microbiology Spectrum
Published
2022-04-27
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
e0007322-e0007322
ISSN
2165-0497 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220754004
Cited by
31
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbiology Spectrum (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
Clostridium difficile infection, dopamine metabolism, gut-brain axis, neurodevelopmental disorders, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, neuroinflammation, brain regions
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Brain, Clostridium Infections, Dopamine, Humans, Clostridioides difficile, Mice, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review