Epidemiology of cryptococcal meningitis and fluconazole heteroresistance in Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from a teaching hospital in southwestern China
Open accessAbstract
Cryptococcal meningitis (CM), a common and serious opportunistic infection mostly caused by Cryptococcus neoformans , is primarily treated with fluconazole. Nevertheless, Cryptococcus neoformans strains that undergo repeated exposure to azoles can gradually acquire heteroresistance to fluconazole. The management of this specific CM infection poses a substantial challenge. Determining a globally accepted definition for fluconazole heteroresistance and developing effective and prompt methods for identifying heteroresistance is of utmost importance. We collected data on the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients diagnosed with CM. All the available Cryptococcus neoformans strains isolated from these patients were collected and subjected to antifungal susceptibility testing and evaluation of fluconazole heteroresistance. AIDS was present in 40.5% of the patients, whereas 24.1% did not have any underlying diseases. Patients with chronic diseases or impaired immune systems are susceptible to infection by Cryptococcus neoformans , a fungus that frequently (39.6%, 19/48) shows heteroresistance to fluconazole, as confirmed by population analysis profile (PAP). IMPORTANCE: Fluconazole heteroresistance poses a significant threat to the efficacy of fluconazole in treating cryptococcal meningitis (CM). Unfortunately, the standard broth microdilution method often misses the subtle percentages of subpopulations exhibiting heteroresistance. While the population analysis profile (PAP) method is esteemed as the gold standard, its time-consuming and labor-intensive nature makes it impractical for routine clinical use. In contrast, the Kirby-Bauer (KB) disk diffusion method offers a simple and effective screening solution. Our study highlights the value of KB over PAP and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by demonstrating that when adjusting the inoculum concentration to 1.0 McFarland and subjecting samples to a 72-hour incubation period at 35°C, the KB method closely mirrors the outcomes of the PAP approach in detecting fluconazole heteroresistance. This optimization of the KB method not only enhances assay efficiency but also provides a blueprint for developing a timely and effective strategy for identifying heteroresistance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinically, heteroresistance refers to persistent infection, treatment failure, or relapse despite in vitro susceptibility results indicating sensitivity.
“Clinically, it refers to persistent infection, treatment failure, or relapse, despite in vitro susceptibility results indicating sensitivity [97,98].”
From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [97]
The Introduction says standard testing may misclassify heteroresistant strains as susceptible, and the Discussion identifies treatment failure, relapse, and persistent infection as potential impacts. The paper defines heteroresistance by resistant and susceptible subpopulations, however; it does not define it clinically by those outcomes or establish that they occurred despite a susceptible in vitro result. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRecently the novel Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for heteroresistance detection.
“Recently the novel Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for heteroresistance detection, though the PAP test remains the current standard method [97].”
From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [97]
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports a higher hit rate for the Kirby–Bauer method under specific test conditions, and the Importance section describes it as an efficient screening method. But the paper says its results closely mirrored PAP—not that it demonstrated superior diagnostic performance—and notes false positives and false negatives compared with PAP. It identifies PAP as the gold standard. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPAP test remains the current standard method for heteroresistance detection.
“Recently the novel Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for heteroresistance detection, though the PAP test remains the current standard method [97].”
From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [97]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, S., Lu, H., Yu, H., Wang, X., Jia, X., Tang, D., Wu, L., Huang, S., & Yang, P.
- Affiliations
- The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN)
- Xiamen University (CN)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Shifeng
- Yang, Ping
- Venue
- Microbiology Spectrum
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2024-08-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e0072524-e0072524
- ISSN
- 2165-0497 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11302267
- OpenAlex
- W4400654545
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Microbiology Spectrum (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82002255)
- CSTC | Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality (Grant No. CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0179,cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0217,No. cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0519)
- CQMHC | Science-Health Joint Medical Scientific Research Project of Chongqing (Grant No. 2022QNXM002)
- Chongqing Municipal Education Commission Foundation (Grant No. CYS20191)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
- Keywords
- cryptococcal meningitis, Cryptococcus neoformans, azole resistance, population analysis profile, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, antifungal susceptibility testing, HIV/AIDS, immunocompromised patients, minimum inhibitory concentration
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antifungal Agents, China, Cryptococcus neoformans, Female, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, Fluconazole, Meningitis, Cryptococcal, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review