The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deep seismic reflection profiles across the Chicxulub Crater
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Geophysical modelling has suggested a thickness of ~3-4 km for the inner impact-melt sheet at Chicxulub (Sharpton et al. 1993;Pilkington et al. 1994;Snyder and Hobbs 1999;Morgan et al. 2000), similar to the thickness of the SIC (~3 km, if the basal member of the overlying Onaping Formation is included as part of the impact-melt sheet [Grieve and Cintala 1992]) at Sudbury.”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Snyder and Hobbs 1999
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
GRIEVE, R. A. F., REIMOLD, W. U., MORGAN, J., RILLER, U., & PILKINGTON, M. (2008) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01086.x · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Snyder, D. B., & Hobbs, R. W.
- Venue
- Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution; II
- Publisher
- Geological Society of America
- Published
- 1999
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
