Cited by 30Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeological and Geochemical AnalysisEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Implications of an integrated late Ediacaran to early Cambrian stratigraphy of the Siberian Platform, Russia

Open access
Bowyer, Fred T., Zhuravlev, Andrey Yu, Wood, Rachel, Zhao, Fangchen, Sukhov, Sergei S., Alexander, Ruaridh D., Poulton, Simon W., Zhu, Maoyan·2023·GSA Bulletin

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The transition from the terminal Ediacaran to early Cambrian (ca. 550−530 Ma) witnessed both the decline of Ediacaran-type soft-bodied and skeletal biota and the rapid diversification of Cambrian-type skeletal biota, which dominate the Terreneuvian (ca. 538.8−521 Ma) fossil record. This interval hosts globally widespread positive and negative δ13Ccarb excursions, including a negative δ13Ccarb excursion near the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary termed the 1n/BACE. Efforts to produce a global composite chemostratigraphic and biostratigraphic correlation through this interval are complicated by stratigraphic incompleteness and a dearth of radiometric ages with which to constrain δ13Ccarb chemostratigraphy. Extensive and richly fossiliferous open-marine carbonates of the Siberian Platform were deposited from the terminal Ediacaran to beyond Cambrian Series 2, and they offer a unique archive to refine this chemostratigraphic and biostratigraphic framework. Here, we present new δ13Ccarb data from two sections of the southeastern Siberian Platform, and we synthesize these with published δ13Ccarb data from multiple sections throughout the Siberian Platform that record near-continuous carbonate deposition from the latest Ediacaran to Cambrian Series 2. This compilation allowed the construction of two possible chemostratigraphic age models that conform to a coherent framework of lithostratigraphic correlation and platformwide stratal stacking patterns. These age models were then used to test alternative calibrations of fossil first appearances and the spatiotemporal evolution of carbonate deposition on the Siberian Platform. Both models support a pre-1n/BACE appearance of anabaritids in the most distal open-marine sections, and they confirm a transitional Ediacaran-Cambrian biotic assemblage that consisted of co-occurring cloudinids and anabaritids. Sedimentologic and sequence stratigraphic analysis on the Siberian Platform also provides strong evidence to indicate that the 1n/BACE marks the onset of a gradual, pulsed rise in relative sea level that was sustained throughout the Terreneuvian and Series 2 of the Cambrian.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/b36534.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The peak in mean genus density at the base of Cambrian Stage 2, ~528 to 527 Ma, largely results from fossiliferous transgressive limestones across the Siberian Platform at the base of the "S5" sequence.

    “The peak in mean genus density at the base of Cambrian Stage 2, ~528 to 527 Ma, which results from normalization of mean generic richness to the volume of host shallow to mid-depth carbonates (Fig. 4C), largely results from fossiliferous transgressive limestones across the Siberian Platform at the base of the “S5” sequence [see (72)].”

    From Sea level controls on Ediacaran-Cambrian animal radiations (2024) · cites this paper as [72]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 30

Authors
Bowyer, F. T., Zhuravlev, A. Y., Wood, R., Zhao, F., Sukhov, S. S., Alexander, R. D., Poulton, S. W., & Zhu, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Siberian Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineral Resources (RU)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
GSA Bulletin
Published
2023-01-11
ISSN
  • 0016-7606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2674
OpenAlex
W4315631868
Cited by
30
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Geological Society of America Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/R010129/1, NE/P013627/1, NE/T008458/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary, carbon isotope excursion, Siberian Platform, Ediacaran-Cambrian transition, relative sea-level rise, Terreneuvian, Cambrian Series 2, sequence stratigraphy, biotic diversification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review