The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Precambrian geology and tectonic history of North America
Abstract
North America is an old continent. Whereas South America and Africa were not assembled until 0.7 Ga, and the assembly of Eurasia began at 0.3 Ga, most of the North American craton has been coherent since 1.7 Ga. This craton, known as Laurentia, included Greenland and northwest Scotland until their partial separation in the Late Cretaceous. This chapter describes the constituents of Laurentia, their aggregation in the Early Proterozoic (Table 1), and subsequent adventures of the craton until the rifting events at the end of the Proterozoic, which gave the continent approximately its present shape. Radiogenic isotopic data from the Precambrian shield, and from inliers and subsurface samples on the platform indicate that about 55 percent of the area of the craton separated from the mantle in the Archean and about 45 percent in the Proterozoic (Fig. 1). In this regard, the shield is not representative of the craton as a whole, being strongly biased in favor of Archean crust (Fig. 2). Conversely, most of the Proterozoic crust underlies the Phanerozoic sedimentary veneer of the southern interior platform. The Archean protocraton of Laurentia is an aggregate of seven former microcontinents (Fig. 1): the familiar Superior, Wyoming, Slave, and Nain (North Atlantic) provinces, and the newly recognized Hearne, Rae, and Burwell provinces (formerly parts of the composite Churchill province). The Rae province includes northern, southwestern, and southeastern prongs. Each province is a Late Archean crustal aggregate and contains variable proportions of Early and/or Middle Archean crust. Early Proterozoic rifting and subsequent collisional deformation govern the dimensions of the provinces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New tectonic divisions of the Grenville Province, Southeast Canadian Shield
Rivers, T., Martignole, J., Gower, C. F., & Davidson, A. (1989) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/tc008i001p00063 · Cited by 383
Zolnai, A. I., Price, R. A., & Helmstaedt, H. (1984) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/e84-048 · Cited by 90
Cited by
Orogenic gold and geologic time: a global synthesis
Goldfarb, R. J., Groves, D. I., & Gardoll, S. (2001) · Ore Geology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-1368(01)00016-6 · Cited by 1,457
The late Archean record: A puzzle in ca. 35 pieces
Bleeker, W. (2003) · Lithos · doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2003.07.003 · Cited by 766
Blueschists and eclogites of the world and their exhumation
Maruyama, S., Liou, J. G., & Terabayashi, M. (1996) · International Geology Review · doi:10.1080/00206819709465347 · Cited by 625
Lithotectonic elements of the Grenville Province: review and tectonic implications
Rivers, T. (1997) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/s0301-9268(97)00038-7 · Cited by 558
SMITHIES, R. H. (2000) · Journal of Petrology · doi:10.1093/petrology/41.12.1653 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, P. F.
- Venue
- The Geology of North America—An Overview
- Publisher
- Geological Society of America
- Published
- 1989
- Pages
- 447-512
- OpenAlex
- W2476550529
- Cited by
- 873
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.27
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precambrian geology and tectonic history of North America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1130/dnag-gna-a.447
- The paper
- Hoffman, P. F. (1989). Precambrian geology and tectonic history of North America. The Geology of North America—An Overview. https://doi.org/10.1130/dnag-gna-a.447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.