Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can marine anoxic events draw down the trace element inventory of seawater?

Algeo, Thomas J.·2004·Geology

Abstract

Research Article| December 01, 2004 Can marine anoxic events draw down the trace element inventory of seawater? Thomas J. Algeo Thomas J. Algeo 1Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0013, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Thomas J. Algeo 1Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0013, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 14 Jun 2004 Revision Received: 25 Aug 2004 Accepted: 31 Aug 2004 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2682 Print ISSN: 0091-7613 Geological Society of America Geology (2004) 32 (12): 1057–1060. https://doi.org/10.1130/G20896.1 Article history Received: 14 Jun 2004 Revision Received: 25 Aug 2004 Accepted: 31 Aug 2004 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Thomas J. Algeo; Can marine anoxic events draw down the trace element inventory of seawater?. Geology 2004;; 32 (12): 1057–1060. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G20896.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract The trace element inventory of seawater is likely to have varied in the past owing to changes in the proportion of oxic-suboxic versus anoxic marine facies. Because only ∼0.3% of the modern global seafloor is subject to benthic anoxia, removal of redox- sensitive trace elements from seawater is largely mediated by oxic-suboxic facies. This results in higher concentrations and longer residence times for such elements in seawater compared with strongly anoxic paleoseas such as those of the Late Devonian. Reservoir modeling of Mo in Late Devonian seawater suggests that its concentration could have been reduced to ∼30%–50% of the present-day value. Chemostratigraphic data from Upper Devonian black shales of the Central Appalachian Basin provide empirical evidence of such depletion: sedimentary Mo concentrations decline within the Cleveland Shale despite intensified benthic anoxia, as proxied by degree of pyritization. Mo may have been depleted in penecontemporaneous seawater as a consequence of elevated burial fluxes associated with black shale deposition at time scales of 105 to >106 yr. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/g20896.1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Metadata

Authors
Algeo, T. J.
Venue
Geology
Published
2004
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
1057
ISSN
0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080159193
Cited by
271
References
3
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can marine anoxic events draw down the trace element inventory of seawater? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1130/g20896.1
The paper
Algeo, T. J. (2004). Can marine anoxic events draw down the trace element inventory of seawater? Geology. https://doi.org/10.1130/g20896.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.