Cited by 140Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsOrigins and Evolution of LifeGeological formations and processes

Bacterial fossils and microbial dolomite in Triassic stromatolites

Open access
Perri, Edoardo, Tucker, Maurice·2007·Geology

Abstract

Triassic stromatolitic dolomite from Italy preserves mineralized bacterial remains, one of the first unequivocal identifications of such structures in the geological record. They consist of empty spheroids 1.0 µm diameter resembling coccoid bacteria, and smaller, 150–400 nm, objects interpreted as dwarf bacterial forms, occurring within and between syn-sedimentary dolomite crystals. Moreover, gently folded sheets, 100–200 nm thick and several micrometers long, form a sub-polygonal network reminiscent of EPS (extracellular polymeric substance). Their granular-textured surfaces suggest bacterial degradation of original organic matter. These features confirm a biological origin for the stromatolites, as in modern microbial mats, and the preserved original geochemical signatures indicate early precipitation of Mg-carbonates induced through microbial sulfate-reducing metabolic activities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/g23354a.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nanoparticle aggregates have been observed in Holocene dolomites, as well as in some ancient dolomites.

    “Nanoparticle aggregates have been observed in Holocene dolomites (e.g., Bontognali et al., 2010;Nyirö-Kása et al., 2018;Raudsepp et al., 2022), as well as in some ancient dolomites (Perri and Tucker, 2007;Sánchez-Román et al., 2008;Sun et al., 2023).”

    From A non-classical crystallization mechanism of microbially-induced disordered dolomite (2024) · cites this paper as Perri and Tucker, 2007

  • This unique morphology and texture were considered as potential biomarkers suggesting microbial activity or presence of fossilized bacteria or viruses.

    “This unique morphology and texture were considered as potential biomarkers suggesting microbial activity or the presence of fossilized bacteria or viruses (e.g., Perri and Tucker, 2007;Sun et al., 2023).”

    From A non-classical crystallization mechanism of microbially-induced disordered dolomite (2024) · cites this paper as Perri and Tucker, 2007

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 140

Authors
Perri, E., & Tucker, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Calabria (IT)
  • Durham University (GB)
Venue
Geology
Published
2007
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
207
ISSN
0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077873201
Cited by
140
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Geology (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archive of Doctoral Theses and Digital Collections (University of Calabria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Durham University
  • Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
Keywords
stromatolites, Triassic, coccoid bacteria, extracellular polymeric substances, microbial sulfate reduction, magnesium carbonate precipitation, microbial mats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review