Cited by 34Tree-ring climate responsesearthquake and tectonic studiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

Tree-ring 14C links seismic swarm to CO2 spike at Yellowstone, USA

Evans, W. C., Bergfeld, D., McGeehin, J. P., King, J. C., Heasler, H.·2010·Geology

Abstract

Research Article| December 01, 2010 Tree-ring 14C links seismic swarm to CO2 spike at Yellowstone, USA William C. Evans; William C. Evans * 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA *E-mail: wcevans@usgs.gov. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Deborah Bergfeld; Deborah Bergfeld 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John P. McGeehin; John P. McGeehin 2U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John C. King; John C. King 3Lone Pine Research, 2604 Westridge Drive, Bozeman, Montana 59715, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Henry Heasler Henry Heasler 4National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming 82190, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information William C. Evans * 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA Deborah Bergfeld 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA John P. McGeehin 2U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192, USA John C. King 3Lone Pine Research, 2604 Westridge Drive, Bozeman, Montana 59715, USA Henry Heasler 4National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming 82190, USA *E-mail: wcevans@usgs.gov. Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 28 Apr 2010 Revision Received: 29 Jun 2010 Accepted: 01 Jul 2010 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2682 Print ISSN: 0091-7613 © 2010 Geological Society of America Geology (2010) 38 (12): 1075–1078. https://doi.org/10.1130/G31345.1 Article history Received: 28 Apr 2010 Revision Received: 29 Jun 2010 Accepted: 01 Jul 2010 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation William C. Evans, Deborah Bergfeld, John P. McGeehin, John C. King, Henry Heasler; Tree-ring 14C links seismic swarm to CO2 spike at Yellowstone, USA. Geology 2010;; 38 (12): 1075–1078. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G31345.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract Mechanisms to explain swarms of shallow seismicity and inflation-deflation cycles at Yellowstone caldera (western United States) commonly invoke episodic escape of magma-derived brines or gases from the ductile zone, but no correlative changes in the surface efflux of magmatic constituents have ever been documented. Our analysis of individual growth rings in a tree core from the Mud Volcano thermal area within the caldera links a sharp ∼25% drop in 14C to a local seismic swarm in 1978. The implied fivefold increase in CO2 emissions clearly associates swarm seismicity with upflow of magma-derived fluid and shows that pulses of magmatic CO2 can rapidly traverse the 5-km-thick brittle zone, even through Yellowstone's enormous hydrothermal reservoir. The 1978 event predates annual deformation surveys, but recognized connections between subsequent seismic swarms and changes in deformation suggest that CO2 might drive both processes. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/g31345.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 34

Authors
Evans, W. C., Bergfeld, D., McGeehin, J. P., King, J. C., & Heasler, H.
Affiliations
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • National Park Service (US)
Corresponding author
Evans, W. C.
Venue
Geology
Published
2010-11-12
Volume
38
Issue
12
Pages
1075-1078
ISSN
  • 0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2682
OpenAlex
W2124352651
Cited by
34
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Park Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
tree-ring radiocarbon, CO2 release, earthquake swarms, Yellowstone National Park, volcanic CO2, Yellowstone caldera, eruption forecasting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review