Mid-latitude glacial erosion hotspot related to equatorial shifts in southern Westerlies
Abstract
Research Article| November 01, 2015 Mid-latitude glacial erosion hotspot related to equatorial shifts in southern Westerlies Frédéric Herman; Frédéric Herman * 1Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland *E-mail: frederic.herman@unil.ch Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Mark Brandon Mark Brandon 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Frédéric Herman * 1Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland Mark Brandon 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA *E-mail: frederic.herman@unil.ch Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 25 May 2015 Revision Received: 31 Aug 2015 Accepted: 02 Sep 2015 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online Issn: 1943-2682 Print Issn: 0091-7613 © 2015 Geological Society of America Geology (2015) 43 (11): 987–990. https://doi.org/10.1130/G37008.1 Article history Received: 25 May 2015 Revision Received: 31 Aug 2015 Accepted: 02 Sep 2015 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Frédéric Herman, Mark Brandon; Mid-latitude glacial erosion hotspot related to equatorial shifts in southern Westerlies. Geology 2015;; 43 (1…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Low-temperature thermochronology studies suggest using erosion values between 0.1 and 1 mm yr-1 from 7 to 4 Ma, followed by a period of erosional quiescence (<0.1 mm yr-1) and a possible increase to 1 mm yr-1 in the last ∼2 Myr in the SPI region.
“Fosdick et al. (2013), Herman and Brandon (2015), Fernandez et al. (2016), andMuller et al. (2023) suggest using values between 0.1 and 1 mm yr -1 from 7 to 4 Ma, followed by a period of erosional quiescence (< 0.1 mm yr -1 ) and a possible increase to 1 mm yr -1 in the last ∼ 2 Myr in the SPI region”
From Fast uplift in the southern Patagonian Andes due to long- and short-term deglaciation and the asthenospheric window underneath (2024) · cites this paper as Herman and Brandon, 2015
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- Herman, F., & Brandon, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Lausanne (CH)
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Geology
- Publisher
- Geological Society of America
- Published
- 2015-10-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 987-990
- ISSN
- 0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2682
- OpenAlex
- W2201416243
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geology (publishedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
- Keywords
- glacial erosion, Southern Westerlies, atmospheric circulation, ice sheet mass balance, Antarctic ice sheet, ice shelf-ocean interaction, ice flow, ice shelf collapse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
