Cited by 16Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyGeological formations and processes

Extensive bioturbation in a middle Cambrian Burgess Shale–type fossil Lagerstätte in northwestern Canada

Pratt, Brian R., Kimmig, Julien·2019·Geology

Abstract

Research Article| January 18, 2019 Extensive bioturbation in a middle Cambrian Burgess Shale–type fossil Lagerstätte in northwestern Canada Brian R. Pratt; Brian R. Pratt 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Julien Kimmig Julien Kimmig 2Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Brian R. Pratt 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada Julien Kimmig 2Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 03 Sep 2018 Revision Received: 04 Jan 2019 Accepted: 04 Jan 2019 First Online: 18 Jan 2019 Online Issn: 1943-2682 Print Issn: 0091-7613 © 2019 Geological Society of America Geology (2019) 47 (3): 231–234. https://doi.org/10.1130/G45551.1 Article history Received: 03 Sep 2018 Revision Received: 04 Jan 2019 Accepted: 04 Jan 2019 First Online: 18 Jan 2019 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Brian R. Pratt, Julien Kimmig; Extensive bioturbation in a middle Cambrian Burgess Shale–type fossil Lagerstätte in northwestern Canada. Geology 2019;; 47 (3): 231–234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G45551.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract Mudstones hosting Burgess Shale–type preservation of soft-bodied fossils are commonly held to be characterized by little to no bioturbation. This has been taken as evidence for bottom-water dysoxia or anoxia, along with anaerobic conditions in the sediment, which favored preservation of soft tissues by hindering decay. Although invisible on fresh and weathered surfaces, laminated claystone comprising the middle Cambrian (Drumian) Ravens Throat River Lagerstätte in the Rockslide Formation of the Mackenzie Mountains, northwestern Canada, is revealed by preparation of surfaces sawn parallel to bedding to exhibit extensive burrowing. Four types of burrows are distinguished: (1) rare large forms averaging 15 mm in diameter; (2) backfilled vertical burrows 3–6 mm wide; (3) oblique to horizontal burrows 2–4 mm wide and typically with meniscate backfilling; and (4) tiny, short, mostly vertical burrows 0.5–1 mm in diameter. The third group is the most common, locally completely bioturbating laminae and penetrating worm carcasses; it conforms to Planolites. A variety of ethologies is indicated, with the large type seemingly serving as a dwelling burrow and the smaller ones from deposit-feeding. Although dysoxic bottom conditions probably developed occasionally, the widespread burrowing argues for predominantly oxic conditions, and it indicates that restriction of bioturbation was probably not the most important factor leading to soft-tissue preservation. Bioturbation might be more common in other Cambrian Lagerstätten than is currently believed, and it is possible that low-oxygen conditions at the seafloor were not fundamentally necessary for Burgess Shale–type preservation. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/g45551.1

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If dead prior to their transport, endobenthic taxa (e.g., Cambrian priapulids) are automatically buried at deeper levels within the sediment, slowing down their decay.

    “Moreover, if dead prior to their transport, endobenthic taxa (e.g., Cambrian priapulids) are automatically buried at deeper levels within the sediment, slowing down their decay (Pratt & Kimmig, 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pratt, B. R., & Kimmig, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Venue
Geology
Published
2019-01-18
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
231-234
ISSN
0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910054912
Cited by
16
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
Keywords
Middle Cambrian, fossil Lagerstätte, mudstone, trace fossils, burrows, paleoecology, Cambrian biota, northwestern Canada, paleoenvironmental reconstruction, soft-bodied fossils, paleoceanography, paleoclimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review