The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Appalachian suspect terranes
Abstract
Since the advent of plate tectonics, the widely accepted model for the development of the Appalachian orogen has involved the opening and closing of a late Precambrian-Paleozoic Iapetus Ocean. Only a few of a growing number of geologically distinctive terranes are easily explained by this model. Vestiges of Iapetus are nowhere coupled to the ancient North American margin. Furthermore, it cannot be demonstrated that any of the extensive Appalachian terranes, now east of the Iapetus tract or its suture, were once connected to the North American miogeocline. All are therefore suspect. The major suspect terranes of the Appalachian orogen are in most respects analogous to previously recognized zones or tectonic lithofacies belts. In the north, these are the Dunnage, Gander, Avalon, and Meguma terranes. In the south, they include easterly parts of the Blue Ridge, the Piedmont, Slate Beit, and the geophysically distinctive Brunswick and Tallahassee-Suwannee terranes beneath the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Most of these are composite and include smaller terranes of uncertain paleogeography. Taconic allochthons are included because they fit the definition of suspect terranes. Stratigraphic and sedimentologic analyses indicate that the Appalachian orogen built up during three major Paleozoic accretionary events. Their timing coincides with the times of structural, metamorphic, and plutonic effects assigned to the Taconian, Acadian, and Alleghanian orogenies. Accretion of the Appalachian orogen progressed from the North American miogeocline outward. The boundaries of the earliest accreted western terranes are marked by melange zones and ophiolite complexes, implying head-on collisions. Later boundaries between eastern terranes are steep mylonite zones and brittle faults, implying oblique movements. The suspect terrane concept, first developed for the North American Cordilleran, provides new insights into the evolution of the Appalachian orogen and solves several enigmas. It is a surgically clean analytical approach and a superior framework in which to view the anatomy of any complex orogen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nd and Sr isotopic variations of Early Paleozoic oceans
Keto, L. S., & Jacobsen, S. B. (1987) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(87)90173-7 · Cited by 360
Mélanges and mélange-forming processes: A historical overview and new concepts
Festa, A., Pini, G. A., Dilek, Y., & Codegone, G. (2010) · International Geology Review · doi:10.1080/00206810903557704 · Cited by 355
Narbonne, G. M., Myrow, P. M., Landing, E., & Anderson, M. M. (1987) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/e87-124 · Cited by 301
Sinistral transpression and the Silurian closure of Iapetus
SOPER, N. J., STRACHAN, R. A., HOLDSWORTH, R. E., GAYER, R. A., & GREILING, R. O. (1992) · Journal of the Geological Society · doi:10.1144/gsjgs.149.6.0871 · Cited by 295
Bédard, J. H., Brouillette, P., Madore, L., & Berclaz, A. (2003) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/s0301-9268(03)00181-5 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, H., & Hatcher, R. D.
- Venue
- Geological Society of America Memoirs
- Publisher
- Geological Society of America
- Published
- 1983
- Pages
- 33-53
- ISSN
- 0072-1069
- OpenAlex
- W1820659196
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.84
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Appalachian suspect terranes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1130/mem158-p33
- The paper
- Williams, H., & Hatcher, R. D. (1983). Appalachian suspect terranes. Geological Society of America Memoirs. https://doi.org/10.1130/mem158-p33
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.