The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biostratigraphy and isotope stratigraphy and the ‘catastrophic’ extinction of calcareous nannoplankton at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary
Abstract
The biostratigraphy of Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary sections from eight localities is summarized and compared in order to define a continuous or complete section. The El Kef, Tunisia, section is apparently the thickest C/T boundary section as yet discribed and contains all the biostratigraphical criteria required to define a complete section; that is, the uppermost Cretaceous Micula prinsiiZone, the “boundary clay” within the lowermost Tertiary Globigerina fringaZine, followed by the Globigerina eugubinaand pseudobulloidesZones. Using these zonations, a correlation of the stable-isotope stratigraphy from the various sections was made. The latest Cretaceous oceans and the earliest Tertiary oceans contained significantly different isotopic signals, which were incorporated into the tests of the calcareous nannofossils. The carbon-isotope signals are apparently global, synchronous, and primarily determined by changes in oceanic fertility, whereas the oxygen-isotope signals are globally induced but modified regionally according to paleogeographic positon and paleocirculation patterns. Further, this combination of biostratigraphy and isotope stratigraphy indicates that Cretaceous nannofossils in the lowest Tertiary sediments, previously thought to be reworked, actually survived the C/T boundary events and continued to reproduce in the earliest Tertiary oceans. These relic species became extinct some tens of thousands of years after the actual C/T boundary, probably as a consequence of the environmental stress following the C/T boundary events rather than as a result of a “catastrophic” extinction coinciding with the C/T boundary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Permian-Triassic of the Tethys: Carbon isotope studies
Baud, A., Magaritz, M., & Holser, W. T. (1989) · Geologische Rundschau · doi:10.1007/bf01776196 · Cited by 342
Molina, E., Alegret, L., Arenillas, I., Arz, J. A., Gallala, N., Hardenbol, J., Salis, K. V., Steurbaut, E., Vandenberghe, N., & Zaghbib-Turki, D. (2006) · Episodes · doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2006/v29i4/004 · Cited by 251
Stüben, D., Kramar, U., Berner, Z., Stinnesbeck, W., Keller, G., & Adatte, T. (2002) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/s0031-0182(01)00401-1 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Perch-Nielsen, K., McKenzie, J., & He, Q.
- Venue
- Geological Implications of Impacts of Large Asteroids and Comets on the Earth
- Publisher
- Geological Society of America
- Published
- 1982
- Pages
- 353-372
- OpenAlex
- W2416833765
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biostratigraphy and isotope stratigraphy and the ‘catastrophic’ extinction of calcareous nannoplankton at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1130/spe190-p353
- The paper
- Perch-Nielsen, K., McKenzie, J., & He, Q. (1982). Biostratigraphy and isotope stratigraphy and the ‘catastrophic’ extinction of calcareous nannoplankton at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary. Geological Implications of Impacts of Large Asteroids and Comets on the Earth. https://doi.org/10.1130/spe190-p353
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.