Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Isolation, identification and characterization of fluoride resistant bacteria: Possible role in bioremediation

Chouhan, S., Tuteja, U., Flora, S. J. S.·2012·Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology

Abstract

Microorganisms found in industrial effluents and near the sites of the contamination can be used to indicate pollution and detoxify the contaminated water resources. Emergence of xenobiotic resistant bacteria among them might be potential application in bioremediation. The objective of this study was to isolate and characterize fluoride resistant bacteria from soil and water samples of different regions of India. Five isolates were recovered from different samples which were found to be fluoride resistant. Two of them effectively reduced the fluoride from their media. Through the current study it can be predicted that fluoride pollution results in selective pressure that leads to the development of fluoride resistant among bacterial populations, probably through the mechanism which involved high affinity anion binding compounds called ionophores. Resistant microbes may play a bioremediative role by transforming and concentrating these anions so that they are less available and less dangerous.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1134/s0003683812010036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Eren, E., Ozturk, M., Mumcu, E.F., and Canatan, D., Toxicol. Ind. Hlth., 2005, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 255–258. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hanaa, A., Mokhtar, I., and Yousef, B., Fd. Chem. Toxicol., 2009, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2332–2337. · DOI
  3. He, L.F. and Chen, J.G., World J. Gastroenterol., 2006, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1144–1148. · DOI
  4. Zhang, M., Wang, A., Xia, T, and He, P., Toxicol. Lett., 2008, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 1–5. · DOI
  5. Chouhan, S., Lomash, V., and Flora, S.J.S., J. Appl. Toxicol., 2010, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 63–73. · DOI
  6. Susheela, A.K., Bhatnagar, M., Vig, K., and Mondal, N.K., Fluoride, 2005, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 98–108.
  7. Misra, U.K., Neurol. India, 2010, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 338–507. · DOI
  8. Hussein, H., Moawad, H., and Farag, S., Arab. J. Biotech., 2004, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–22. · DOI
  9. Mergeay, M., Trends Biotechnol., 1991, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 17–24. · DOI
  10. Hughes, M.N. and Poole, R.K., J. Gen. Microbiol., 1991, vol. 137, no. 4, 725–734. · DOI
  11. Nies, D.H., Plasmid, 1992, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 17–28. · DOI
  12. Joshi-Tope, G.A. and Francis, J., J. Bacteriol., 1995, vol. 177, no. 8, pp. 1989–1993. · DOI
  13. Silver, S. and Phung, L.T., Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 1996, vol. 50, pp. 753–789. · DOI
  14. Mullen, M.D., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 3143–3149. · DOI
  15. Filali, B.K., Taoufik, J., Zeroual, Y., Dzairi, F.A.Z., Talbi, M., and Blaghen, M., Curr. Microbiol., 1999, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 151–156. · DOI
  16. Gupta, A., Phung, L.T., Taylor, D.E., and Silver, S., Microbiology, 2001, vol. 147,(Pt 12), pp. 3393–3402 · DOI
  17. Dolowy, K., Cell. Biol. Mol. Lett., 2001, vol. 6, no. 2A, pp. 343–347.
  18. Kim, K.S., Cui, C., and Cho, S. J., J. Phys. Chem. B, 1998, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 461–463. · DOI
  19. Evans, J.B. and Kloos, E.W., Appl. Microbiol., 1972, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 326–331. · DOI
  20. Laemmli, U.K., Nature, 1970, vol. 227, no. 5259, pp. 680–685. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F., and Sambrook, J., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, New York, Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Lab., 1982.
  22. Rajbhansi, A., Our Nature, 2008, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 52–57. · DOI
  23. Wasi S., Jeelani G., and Ahmad M., Chemosphere, 2008, vol. 71, no. 7, 1348-1355. · DOI
  24. Wodeyar, B.K. and Sreenivasan, G., Curr. Sci., 1996, vol. 70, pp. 71–74.
  25. Aithani, P.B., Gurjar, R., Banerji, R., Balaji, B.K., Ramachandran, S., and Singh, R., Curr. Sci., 1998, vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 773–777.
  26. Arulananthan, A., Ramakrishna, T.V., and Balasubramanian, N., Ind. J. Env. Protect., 1992, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 531–536.
  27. Singano, J.J., Mashauri, D.A., Dahi, E., and Mtalo, F.W., in Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Fluorosis and Defluorosis of Water, Oct., 1995 Eli, D. and Henrik, B., Eds., Ngurdoto, Tanzania, ISFR.
  28. Doble, M. and Kumar, A., J. Hydr. Engg., 2006, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 116–117. · DOI
  29. Vidali, M., Pure Appl. Chem., 2001, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 1163–1172. · DOI
  30. Harrison, J.J., Rabie, M., Turner, R.J., Badry, E.A., Sproule, K.M., and Ceri, H., FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 2006, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 479–491. · DOI
  31. Pas, M., Milacic, R., Draslar, K., Pollak, N., and Raspor, P., Biometals, 2004, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 25–33. · DOI
  32. Ledin, M., Earth Sci. Rev., 2000, vol. 51, nos. 1–4, pp. 1–31. · DOI
  33. Bowden, G. H. W., Odlum, O., Nolette, N., and Hamilton, I. R., Infect. Immun., 1982, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 247–254. · DOI
  34. Beighton, D. and McDougll, W.A., J. Dent. Res., 1977, vol. 56, pp. 1185–1191. · DOI
  35. Beighton, D. and Colman, G., J. Dent. Res., 1976, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 875–878. · DOI
  36. Moyer, C.L., Dobbs, F.C., and Karl, D.M., Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1995, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1555–1562. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chouhan, S., Tuteja, U., & Flora, S. J. S.
Venue
Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology
Published
2011-12-29
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
43-50
ISSN
  • 0003-6838
  • 1608-3024
Cited by
48
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review