Post-translational Modifications of Nucleotide Excision Repair Proteins and Their Role in the DNA Repair
Abstract
Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is one of the major DNA repair pathways aimed at maintaining genome stability. Correction of DNA damage by the NER system is a multistage process that proceeds with the formation of multiple DNA-protein and protein-protein intermediate complexes and requires precise coordination and regulation. NER proteins undergo post-translational modifications, such as ubiquitination, sumoylation, phosphorylation, acetylation, and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. These modifications affect the interaction of NER factors with DNA and other proteins and thus regulate either their recruitment into the complexes or dissociation from these complexes at certain stages of DNA repair, as well as modulate the functional activity of NER proteins and control the process of DNA repair in general. Here, we review the data on the post-translational modifications of NER factors and their effects on DNA repair. Protein poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation catalyzed by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 and its impact on NER are discussed in detail, since such analysis has not been done before.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The NER pathway in eukaryotes is tightly regulated by post-translational modifications and chromatin dynamics.
“Moreover the NER pathway in eukaryotes is tightly regulated by post-translational modifications and chromatin dynamics reviewed in [89,106,107,108,109].”
From Focus on UV-Induced DNA Damage and Repair—Disease Relevance and Protective Strategies (2020) · cites this paper as [109]
Repair of damage both in GG-NER and TC-NER requires chromatin remodeling for enhanced access of pathway factors to existing damage.
“Repair of damage both in GG-NER and TC-NER requires chromatin remodeling for the enhanced access of pathway factors to existing damage.”
From Focus on UV-Induced DNA Damage and Repair—Disease Relevance and Protective Strategies (2020) · cites this paper as [109]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 110 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Rechkunova, N. I., Maltseva, E. A., & Lavrik, O. I.
- Affiliations
- Novosibirsk State University (RU)
- Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Rechkunova, N. I.
- Venue
- Biochemistry (Moscow)
- Publisher
- Pleiades Publishing Ltd
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1008-1020
- ISSN
- 0006-2979 (ISSN-L)
- 1608-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2972744629
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Biochemistry (Moscow) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Keywords
- nucleotide excision repair, post-translational modification, ubiquitination, SUMOylation, phosphorylation, acetylation, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, PARP1, DNA repair regulation, protein-protein interaction, genome stability, DNA damage
- MeSH terms
- DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Nucleotides, Protein Processing, Post-Translational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review